Tag:tourism=chalet
From OpenStreetMap
|
This Proposal has been marked for a Post-vote clean-up. Click here for list of proposals needing a post-vote clean-up. |
| Other languages: | +/- |
|---|
| English • |
 chaletback to Key:tourism |
|
| Description: Detached cottages with self-contained cooking/bathroom/toilet facilities |
| Element: help
|
| Useful combination: |
| Implies: |
| Used combinations in: |
- Status
- Part of Map Features
- Proposed by
- User:Chris11
- Proposal date
- 2007-08-11
Contents |
Definition
A type of accommodation. The term chalet is used in the hospitality industry to describe one or more detached cottages with self-contained cooking facilities and/or bathroom and toilet facilities.
tags
key=tourism value=chalet
key=name value=<name of the location>
key=operator value=<name of the operator>
this could apply to nodes (single chalet) or areas (a group of chalets)
Rendering
Comment
- Excellent, this would help round out tourism=hotel, motel, guest_house. May I ask the proposer some questions? I've been looking for words for holiday self-catering places and it would be nice to come up with one or a very small number of tags that would cover them all. Would this be appropriate in the singular, i.e. a single cottage or (larger) farm-house in the UK. What would you use for a building with several rental holiday apartments?, e.g. Australian seaside resorts. I think so far I've been using just tourism=self_catering MikeCollinson 14:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Will this be a single chalet or an area with a "group" of such? -- Ulfl 23:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- i think the intent was for a node to apply to a single chalet, and an area to a group of them. well, that's my guess anyway and that is what i've changed the proposal toMyfanwy 08:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps I being a little pedantic, but can I then suggest that the value should be tourism=chalet (singular)? MikeCollinson 11:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Using the singular tourism=chalet makes more sense here IMHO. -- Ulfl 00:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps I being a little pedantic, but can I then suggest that the value should be tourism=chalet (singular)? MikeCollinson 11:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Voting
voting is open, until 2008-02-04, now extended to 2008-02-18
- i approve this proposal -- Myfanwy 00:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal -- Ulfl 00:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal -- MikeCollinson 08:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal -- Lefty1963 08:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal SlowRider 20:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal --Dalkvist 20:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal --ramack 20:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal--Walley 20:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal --Pt 20:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal -- studerap 21:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I disapprove this proposal -- studerap 21:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC) (I just think this is going too far, what's next a node for a tree ??)
- well, that's been proposed actually... if people want to tag it, that's up to them. personally, i think these would be better under an 'amenity=accommodation' tag, with sub-tags to differentiate Myfanwy 01:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal --dieterdreist 15:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal --Hawke 17:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
