Proposal:Street: Difference between revisions
(→Members: this should be less error-prone) |
|||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{IconNode}} {{IconWay}} {{IconArea}} |
| {{IconNode}} {{IconWay}} {{IconArea}} |
||
| ''address'' |
| ''address / house'' |
||
| Zero or more |
| Zero or more |
||
| Housenumbers / Housenames that belong to the street (as in have the address of the street).<br /> |
| Housenumbers / Housenames that belong to the street (as in have the address of the street).<br /> |
Revision as of 18:55, 29 November 2009
This Relation is used to bind all parts of a street together and everything else that belongs to it (especially addresses). A 'street' in this case, consists of all ways with the same street-name (in one city of course, not everywhere).
Rationale
Since many streets are split into many ways (mostly due to different properties), it could be useful if one could have a way to put all those parts back together.
Since both the street-relation and the currently used associatedStreet relation (which binds housenumbers to streets) do pretty much the same, it would be sensible to use one relation to bind all elements of a street together. Otherwise we would have one street-relation that contains all the street segments and at least one accociatedStreet-relation that either contains one of the street segments or maybe the street-relation.
Tags
Key | Value | Comment |
---|---|---|
type | street | Defines that this is a Relation of the type 'street'. |
name | * | The name of the street |
any | * | Any Tag that applies to all parts of the road (this is always true for the 'name', but that's obligatory anyway) |