Search results

synonyms are a minor problem while using OpenStreetMap data and, while irritating, are not a major barrier This benefit will happen only after the alternative

great road coverage, then you may find the Maxar and Digital Globe data irritating. If so, then use the Phantom road filter to remove this data from the

detects low batteries it automatically shuts down, which can be rather irritating, especially in cold weather when it is best to remove batteries and place

shadows make an object flat and unrealistic, shadows that are too long look irritating. Likewise, one should avoid overly characteristic elements in the photographed

participate in such discussion, they just map) Deprecations will break and irritate data consumers using deprecated tags It is common that people treat "tag

(UTC) I approve this proposal. (This is a good start, BUT the tag-value "irritating" needs documentation and someone with knowledge in the field should start

landuse=farm for the farmLAND (ie. fields) is just irritating. -- Fröstel 14:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC) Why irritating? fields (the farmLAND) are part of the farm

information to have transferred so that they edit other people with do not irritate. Welche Möglichkeiten gibt es fuer den Import --> Normal import of a whole

May 2010 (UTC) Well thanks for letting us know, but I must say I find it irritating that you would create a page office=estate_agent, making it look like

Tallguy: I'd rather not generate too many notifications / messages as it could irritate - just give mappers the option of a simple method of checking 12:00 sanderd17:

synonyms are a minor problem while using OpenStreetMap data and, while irritating, are not a major barrier This benefit will happen only after the alternative

be making mistakes such as re-mapping these "missing" map features or irritated by unexpected behaviour such as map features suddenly popping in then data

low contrast to the background (similar colours). This is particularly irritating as other attributions (google and their own (!)) is displayed in a much

proposal. To me the proposal seems to have a good structure. I am only irritated by the first example in the section "Traction Transformers": is that really

19 20:23:35 Cristiano: OK Feb 19 20:23:50 jj0hns0n: tomkralidis may get irritated at me for saying this ;) but some people are now shoving a json dict into