Approved features/Tag:tourism=chalet

The Feature Page for the approved proposal Tag:tourism=chalet can be located at Tag:tourism=chalet.

+/- tourism=chalet Description Detached cottages with self-contained cooking/bathroom/toilet facilities Used on these elements Useful combination Key:name Key:operator Used combinations in World Australia/Oceania Europe (list) Asia (list) Central America (list) South America (list) Africa (list) Status Undefined

Status

Part of Map Features

Proposed by

User:Chris11

Proposal date

2007-08-11

Contents 1 Definition 2 tags 3 Rendering 4 Comment 5 Voting

Definition

A type of accommodation. The term chalet is used in the hospitality industry to describe one or more detached cottages with self-contained cooking facilities and/or bathroom and toilet facilities.

tags

key=tourism value=chalet
key=name value=<name of the location>
key=operator value=<name of the operator>

this could apply to nodes (single chalet) or areas (a group of chalets)

Rendering

Comment

• Excellent, this would help round out tourism=hotel, motel, guest_house. May I ask the proposer some questions? I've been looking for words for holiday self-catering places and it would be nice to come up with one or a very small number of tags that would cover them all. Would this be appropriate in the singular, i.e. a single cottage or (larger) farm-house in the UK. What would you use for a building with several rental holiday apartments?, e.g. Australian seaside resorts. I think so far I've been using just tourism=self_catering MikeCollinson 14:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

• Will this be a single chalet or an area with a "group" of such? -- Ulfl 23:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  • i think the intent was for a node to apply to a single chalet, and an area to a group of them. well, that's my guess anyway and that is what i've changed the proposal toMyfanwy 08:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps I being a little pedantic, but can I then suggest that the value should be tourism=chalet (singular)? MikeCollinson 11:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Using the singular tourism=chalet makes more sense here IMHO. -- Ulfl 00:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Voting

voting is open, until 2008-02-04, now extended to 2008-02-18

• i approve this proposal -- Myfanwy 00:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal -- Ulfl 00:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal -- MikeCollinson 08:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal -- Lefty1963 08:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal SlowRider 20:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal --Dalkvist 20:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal --ramack 20:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal--Walley 20:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal --Pt 20:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal -- studerap 21:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I disapprove this proposal -- studerap 21:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC) (I just think this is going too far, what's next a node for a tree ??)

well, that's been proposed actually... if people want to tag it, that's up to them. personally, i think these would be better under an 'amenity=accommodation' tag, with sub-tags to differentiate Myfanwy 01:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• I approve this proposal --dieterdreist 15:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal --Hawke 17:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)