OpenStreetMap is a social activity

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Available languages — OpenStreetMap is a social activity
Afrikaans Alemannisch aragonés asturianu azərbaycanca Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Melayu Bân-lâm-gú Basa Jawa Baso Minangkabau bosanski brezhoneg català čeština dansk Deutsch eesti English español Esperanto estremeñu euskara français Frysk Gaeilge Gàidhlig galego Hausa hrvatski Igbo interlingua Interlingue isiXhosa isiZulu íslenska italiano Kiswahili Kreyòl ayisyen kréyòl gwadloupéyen Kurdî latviešu Lëtzebuergesch lietuvių magyar Malagasy Malti Nederlands Nedersaksies norsk bokmål norsk nynorsk occitan Oromoo oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Plattdüütsch polski português português do Brasil română shqip slovenčina slovenščina Soomaaliga suomi svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Vahcuengh vèneto Wolof Yorùbá Zazaki српски / srpski беларуская български қазақша македонски монгол русский тоҷикӣ українська Ελληνικά Հայերեն ქართული नेपाली मराठी हिन्दी অসমীয়া বাংলা ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ગુજરાતી ଓଡ଼ିଆ தமிழ் తెలుగు ಕನ್ನಡ മലയാളം සිංහල ไทย မြန်မာဘာသာ ລາວ ភាសាខ្មែរ ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ አማርኛ 한국어 日本語 中文(简体)‎ 吴语 粵語 中文(繁體)‎ ייִדיש עברית اردو العربية پښتو سنڌي فارسی ދިވެހިބަސް

Anonymous edits era

Previously OpenStreetMap had Anonymous edits but users weren't able to communicate using website:

Some may say: no persons, no discussions not big deal

Without communication (via Good changeset comments or via contact channels or good source=* tag) we are not able to tell whatever some change in OSM is correct or not and how we should treat mistake if data is not verifiable on the ground.

Many users check changesets if they find suspicious/unverifiable data

To build trust between users, they should communicate and explain how do they collect data or what was wrong before their edits and what they decided to add/update/delete.

Without trust users will spend significant time checking each-other edits. That's why most of OSM members against copying of other maps: data from other maps cannot be trusted. OSM was created because of this if we ignore copyright and cost of data/services[1].

We want to build map that will be as reliable as possible (Disclaimer)

See also: WhoDidIt, Feeds, Category:Collaborative software

Vandalism or just user mistake?

It is near impossible to tell if some person does productive work if he ignores all communication methods mentioned above.

Proposal process

In order to invent better tags (Any tags you like) mappers have to share their experience about real world and how previous tagging practices should updated/deprecated.

Simple Notes can say so much

List of excellent notes with links to site:

See also