Proposed features/Climbing
| <name> | |
|---|---|
| Status: | Undefined (inactive) |
| Proposed by: | <unknown> |
| Tagging: | <key>=<value> |
| Applies to: | <type> |
| Definition: | <definition> |
| Rendered as: | <appearance> |
| Draft start: | |
| RFC start: | * |
| Vote start: | * |
| Vote end: | * |
This proposal is for a set of tags to describe climbing routes and crags
Contents |
Climbing Routes
Climbing routes can be shown with a single node marking the bottom of the route, tagged with climbing=route_bottom, or two nodes tagged with climbing=route_bottom and climbing=route_top with a way between them tagged with climbing=route.
Since climbing routes are generally quite vertical, the start and end nodes may be almost on top of each other. The rationale behind allowing two nodes and a connecting way, even though they may be extremely close on the map, is to allow a path connecting to the bottom of the route to be differentiated from a path connecting to the top. As such, if there is no top-access to the route, only a single node, marking the start, is probably preferable.
I am interested in this tagging scheme, but actually the status is "inactive". The author of the proposal or other people have used this tags in some place? Can you give an example how it can look? At least the proposed tag route_bottom would be a starting point to register important climbing routes. - See use at [1] --Federico Explorador 16:47, 12 April 2012 (BST)
| Key | Value | Element | Comment | Example | Icon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| name | * | |
Name of the route | ||
| climbing | route_bottom | |
This is the bottom of a climbing route. | ||
| climbing | route_top | |
This is the top of a climbing route. | ||
| climbing | route | |
This is the route itself (but see the note above). | ||
| climbing:rock |
etc. |
|
What type of rock is it? (Note: this could be placed on a relation - see "Crags", below). | ||
| climbing:grade:british:adjectival |
etc. |
|
British adjectival grade for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:british:technical |
etc |
|
British technical grade for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:french |
etc |
|
French grade for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:ewbank |
etc |
|
Ewbank grade for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:brazilian |
etc |
|
Brazilian grade for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:uiaa |
etc |
|
UIAA grade for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:alpine |
|
|
French Alpine System | ||
| climbing:grade:yds_grade |
etc |
|
Yosemite Decimal System grade for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:yds_class |
etc |
|
Yosemite Decimal System class for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:yds_protection |
|
|
Yosemite Decimal System protection rating for the route | ||
| climbing:grade:hueco |
|
|
Hueco bouldering grade | ||
| climbing:bolted |
|
|
Is the route bolted? | ||
| climbing:length | * | |
The length of the route (in metres) | ||
| climbing:pitches | * | |
How many pitches make up the route? (Defaults to 1) |
Crags
All of the routes within a crag can be grouped into a relation and must be tagged with climbing=crag.
| Key | Value | Element | Comment | Example | Icon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| climbing | crag | |
This is a crag. | ||
| name | * | |
Name of the crag | ||
| climbing:rock |
etc. |
|
What type of rock is it? |
Boulders
Boulders are small rocks that have "problems" instead of routes. Sometimes they can be climbed with less protection than other areas to practice moves.
| Key | Value | Element | Comment | Example | Icon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| climbing | boulder | |
This is a boulder | ||
| name | * | |
Name of the boulder | ||
| climbing:rock |
etc. |
|
What type of rock is it? |
Related tags
Accepted Map Features are:
Proposed Features where we could share ideas and maybe re-use common tags: