Proposed features/zone of alienation
From OpenStreetMap Wiki
| zone of alienation | |
|---|---|
| Status: | Undefined (inactive) |
| Proposed by: | Rtzui-2 |
| Tagging: | landuse=zone_of_alienation |
| Applies to: | 
|
| Definition: | zone with a strong nuclear hazard you must not or you should not enter |
| Rendered as: | yellow shaded area with a bold border and the trefoil symbol in the middle 
|
| Draft start: | 2010-04-01 |
| RFC start: | 2010-04-01 |
| Vote start: | ?? |
| Vote end: | ?? |
Why? I don't want my navigationsystem to rout throught such an area.
- This is not an april's fool!
- Examples are Wikipedia:Lake Karachay and Chernobyl
Comments
- Why call it alienation when we can be more specific and call it nuclear contaminated area ? -- Nic 15:54, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- A good idea. --Rtzui-2 17:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think it should be a landuse tag, as any area, perhaps already with some landuse tags can get contaminated. Perhaps use hazard=radiation tag that can be sticked to anything that is contaminated by radiation, be it a way, point or area (See Proposed_features/hazard and perhaps just add radiation amongst the hazards suggested there) --Bilbo 09:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- A good idea. --Rtzui-2 17:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- This tag should not affect navigation. Instead the ways inside the zone should be tagged with access=no and if gates have been erected, they should be tagged with barrier=gate, access=no -- Nic 15:54, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well but at least the user should be warned if he's insinde such an area. German wikipedia says about wikipedia:Semipalatinsk Test Site that this side is public accessible, so i guess there are not gates and you _could_ access it, but this does not mean you should, or you should drive through it. --Rtzui-2 17:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
