From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Lossy "documentation"

Why is this key even accepted. There's basically now documentation for its values, just a bullet list?!? --Ij (talk) 10:12, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

* The wiki often documents current practice, and this key (however badly designed) is in use. Relevant here is that this key seems to have originated in disagreements over the entire practice of mapping trees. It's no wonder it comes off as poorly considered. Brycenesbitt (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

What about landmark natural monuments?

How one is supposed to tag tree that is both landmark and natural monument? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

*You could propose better tagging for natural monument. Something like Proposed_features/heritage where it is not just tagged as a landmark, but the name of the designating agency is present. Brycenesbitt (talk) 23:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Trees on nature trails

Should trees on nature trails get a new tag? They are usually not a natural monument and most of the time not a landmark either. --TBKMrt (talk) 00:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Any comments on that? If there is no comment until 2016-01-16 then I will include and use it anyway (probably using "denotation=nature_trail" --TBKMrt (talk) 11:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
I'll take the absence of comments as nobody cares and add the tag soon once I got a usable image --TBKMrt (talk)