Talk:Proposed features/virtual highway
You are forgetting one important type of areas: Beaches. As one example long distance walking routes sometimes route over beaches. Now you occasionally see a fake highway=path mapped on a beach where none are visible just in order to map a walking route. As another example driving is sometimes permitted on beaches but again there is no permanent visible track. Access restrictions (foot, bicycle, horse, vehicle etc) for the beach can also easily be specified on a highway=virtual way. --polderrunner (talk) 07:49, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I think it would be easier to use something like highway:virtual=*. This way you don't have to apply all the access restrictions and you can e.g. map routes through pedestrian squares with highway:virtual=pedestrian.
highway=virtual,access=no,foot=designated,bicycle=yes really seems like a clutter to me. —M!dgard [ talk | projects | current proposal ] 18:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.20517/3.21792 —M!dgard [ talk | projects | current proposal ] 10:18, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
It is not uncommon to spot marked hiking routes, which goes through parking space (where there is no pavement aside). As in reallity there is no path (and therefore it should not be visible on map) you can easily go through parking space and spot the way marker on the other side of parking. (talk) 14:06, 20 Feb 2016 (UTC)