The icon could be something like this

Discussion

The most logical tag would be

<tag k="amenity" v="nightclub"/>

Vote

• Seems obvious to me! TomChance 22:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• +1. A sister to amenity=pub, appropriate in Frédéric's case :-) MikeCollinson 08:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• +1 ;-) Hakan 20:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• Would it be something other than amenity, like shop=? Ohwell, can't hurt so I +1 - LastGrape 23:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Having amenity=pub and amenity=restaurant, any other key would be pretty strange ... -- Ulfl 23:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• I approve the proposal. --Florianschmitt 07:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• I approve the proposal. -- Ulfl 11:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
• I think this should be a leisure tag, if anything, and not 'amenity'. I can understand a pub or restaurant being classed as amenities because it's useful for travellers to locate sources of food, drink and accommodation.
  • Well, never been out at night in a new town looking for the area where "it's" going on? Having a hint where the pubs, nightclubs, ... concentrates might give you a good hint. -- Ulfl 11:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Not arguing against the recording of nightclubs in the GIS Ulfl but what about addressing my point: Leisure or Amenity? Food, shelter, fuel, banks, emergency services all live in amenity. Nightclubs are too fluffy for this category, no? -AT
• I approve the proposal. --Geoff 08:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Decision

I consider this proposal as approved. A discussion will happen later if necessary on whether it should be "amenity/leisure"="pub/nightclub/cafe"... FredB 20:31, 20 November 2007 (UTC)