Talk:Tag:amenity=ranger station

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Archived Votes from 2013

Please use {{vote|yes}} or {{vote|no}} and give your reasons for opposition or support. Use ~~~~ to sign your user name & date.

  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- --N76 21:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Glassman (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Lyx (talk) 22:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. CS Mur (talk) 22:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Brycenesbitt (talk) 22:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC) (tag proponent)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Janko (talk) 22:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Ansis (talk) 01:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Mmaki (talk) 02:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. kerryg (talk) 05:42, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Tekim (talk) 11:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Milesbarger (talk) 12:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Russell Deffner (talk) 13:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Nateirwin (talk) 15:49, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Makella (talk) 15:50, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Dothandave (talk) 15:49, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. DTWilder (talk) 16:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal.--voschix (talk) 16:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Skorasaurus (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC) My only question or suggestion: Why would a building=yes tag also be needed if the closed way already has amenity=ranger_station on it ? If there's a building whose only use is as a ranger station, then as I understand, adding the building=yes is redundant.
It's true that the remark about "building=yes" could be avoided. For a big station with 2 or more buildings, we can trace a surrounding polygon tagged with "amenity=*" and keep "building" in the building polygones inside (or the station is fenced). See amenity=school doc as a guideline. --Pieren (talk) 17:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
amenity=fire_station recommends the building=yes approach, and the rendering engines use both tags. Brycenesbitt (talk) 06:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
The same remark applies for all features, including fire stations, when the feature is more than one building. --Pieren (talk) 13:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Dchiles (talk) 17:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Fschmidt (talk) 08:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. tpcolson (talk) 12:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Rarspace01 (talk) 11:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. LordOfMaps (talk) 12:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. AlaskaDave (talk) 01:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)