User talk:Frederik Ramm
hi, könntet ihr bei http://tile.bbbike.org/mc/ neben den einzelkarten auch eine funktion mit 2 karten übereinander machen, bei der man dann mit einem schieberegler zwischen den beiden hinundher wechseln kann? so wie es bei http://sautter.com/map/ mal war. --Kenji 18:52, 12 August 2012 (BST)
You said : we don't want people to think this is Wikipedia where citation is in fact needed for everything
- Well, that's a bit of exageration. Wikipedia doesn't needs citation for "everything" not does it asks for citation when none believe it is needed.
- Anyway, imho that doesn't mean we should let any important page be on display like nothing happened and like every one agrees. That page is partly disputed, lying about that won't help. Nor displaying a red box at the beginning like : this page if full of lies either. I find that asking for clarification while expression a degree of doubt in a rather subtle way is perfectly suited. People will then read those sentences while knowing they'll need more digging in order to make their own opinion. Especially when someone take that for granted and starts displaying big red box with the only reason beeing that it is written on verifiability
verifiability of sac_scale / trail_visibility
Your link to Talk:Proposed_features/Hiking isn't convincing me that a debate is still ongoing about verifiability of those tags, those discussions are 7 years old, points made might be outdated now, and there is a warning to ask people to move discussion to current pages. I should add that if we start countings tags that are controversial about their verifiability, I'd soon find that that page was written by haters of those specific tags, and that doesn't help credibility of verifiability. sletuffe (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)