Jump to navigation Jump to search
natural=isthmus and man_made=embankment
A clarification has been added to the proposal. –SelfishSeahorse (talk) 08:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
is it clear when we have a natural=isthmus or a man_made=embankment like ? May it happen that there is a combination of natural und man_made? Please add something how to distinguish the both.--Hfst (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advice. I've added a note that an isthmus is a natural feature and therefore this tag is not intended for embankments. Is this clear enough? I've also added your example, although it uses man_made=embankment on an area despite man_made=embankment is only defined on ways. Regards, –SelfishSeahorse (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
what about isthmus without name?
- Why would we tag an isthmus without a name? There is no point in doing so, only the name makes this a feature. There are infinite places in all scales, where you could see an isthmus. This is about mapping a cultural feature (only because mankind gave a name to the thing it becomes actually a thing). What about place=locality without a name, would that make sense to you? --Dieterdreist (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)