Talk:Tag:amenity=convention centre
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Status
@Maro21: Please don't go on a deprecation spree. There is no proposal to formally replace this yet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity=convention_centre&type=revision&diff=2672021&oldid=2587915
—— Kovposch (talk) 22:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- If you look at the page history, I didn't set the status. maro21 22:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok but should you blindly it automatically by fixing the format alone? No reason was given. Listing out the replacements alone is weak.
—— Kovposch (talk) 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC) - It wasn't listed in Deprecated_features#Deprecated_features with Template:Deprecated features/reason
—— Kovposch (talk) 06:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC) - The reason you had to edit the use and logo is the deprecation didn't use Template:Deprecated properly in the first place. Ironically the Russian page was technically more correct.
—— Kovposch (talk) 07:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok but should you blindly it automatically by fixing the format alone? No reason was given. Listing out the replacements alone is weak.
- This was a technical edit. If the status is "deprecated" then it follows that onNode=no, onWay=no, onArea=no and onRelation=no. Previously, the documentation was contradictory internally.
- > Your edit still doesn't make sense.
- It makes logical sense, because previously the documentation was contradictory internally. If the status is "deprecated" then it follows that the tag should not be used. And if it is onNode=yes, onArea=yes then it means it can be used. Which proves the contradiction.
- Please look at the page history before you blame someone else.
- > No reason was given.
- When making edits, I am guided by what is, not what should be.
- Thanks for the link Template:Deprecated features/reason - I didn't know about this page. maro21 13:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)