Proposed features/isolated dwelling
From OpenStreetMap Wiki
| The Feature Page for this approved proposal can be located at Tag:place=isolated_dwelling. |
| isolated_dwelling | |
|---|---|
| Status: | Approved (active) |
| Proposed by: | dieterdreist |
| Tagging: | place=isolated_dwelling |
| Applies to: | node,area |
| Definition: | isolated_dwellings are smaller than hamlets |
| Rendered as: | * |
| Draft start: | 2010-04-06 |
| RFC start: | 2010-04-06 |
| Vote start: | 2010-04-28 |
| Vote end: | 2010-05-13 |
Contents |
Description
Isolated dwellings are the smallest kind of human settlements. They are smaller than hamlets and are formed by very few buildings. The whole settlement consists of only 1 or 2 households. If there are more than 2 households present at the site, use at least place=hamlet.
Tag values
place=isolated_dwelling
name=*
Node or area?
You can tag this as a single node or as an area. If you choose to use the area draw a way at the boundary of the inhabited space (inside and outside). This will include all buildings and outbuildings, as well as gardens, but not fields and meadows.
Voting
Voting has ended.
- I approve this proposal. -- Dieterdreist 18:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- didoa 19:14, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- Winbladh 05:41, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- Bwurst 06:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. but only if it obsoletes place=farm -- FedericoCozzi 07:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- Hanska 07:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. but only if it obsoletes place=farm -- SteveVG 11:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. -- I don't see any sense in having an area that encompasses buildings. By approving we actually loose information. Also no separation from place=farm -- Extremecarver 14:06, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- Pavi 09:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. but only if it obsoletes place=farm -- Stemby 16:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- damjang 17:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. and fully support obsoleting place=farm with it, as farm is about usage (landuse=* and friends) -- Pecisk 08:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- Bk 15:11, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal.--walley 17:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. --Ulfm 18:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. why not place=hamlet + population=* ? -- Aleksandr Dezhin 16:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- because an isolated dwelling is not a hamlet. Simply because of this. -- Dieterdreist 19:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. --Tessarakt2 13:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
summary
total votes: 17, yes:14 no:3 -> proposal approved
votes cast after voting was ended:
- I oppose this proposal. Seeing a single, large building, I cannot tell how many households are in there. I don't see the necessity of anything below hamlet. --Ipofanes 03:29, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- --Laznik 08:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. -- Wambacher 11:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. I feel this is duplicating place=hamlet, which already sort of is duplicated by place=farm. Do we really need another tag? --Skippern 18:46, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I like this proposal. It's good to find a more general descriptor as place=farm which is too specific. Now we can use it for any isolated house (forest gards, hotels, etc) and not only farms. Hamlet is something bigger, it's a real group of houses/settlement, not only a single familly. --Pieren 21:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. In the past, I don't know how to tag places with few peoples living, because place=hamlet is to vague. It could be used for place from 1 to 1000 habitant. Generally, there is only one family in my area (~ 4 peoples), and I think, this will add more indications. -- Lolo 32 13:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
