Proposed features/mark vehicles, for which restriction is operating

Relation:Restriction - mark vehicles, for which restriction is operating (Variant I)
Status:	Abandoned (inactive)
Proposed by:	Dinamik
Tagging:	restriction=
Applies to:
Definition:	sometimes we have a restrictive sign, that doesn't have exceptions, but has a sort of vehicles, for which this sign is operating; in such cases it is more comfortable to mark vehicles, for which sign is operating, not exceptions from restrictions
Rendered as:
Draft start:	2011-07-05
RFC start:	2011-07-05
Vote start:
Vote end:

Relation:Restriction - mark vehicles, for which restriction is operating (Variant II)
Status:	Abandoned (inactive)
Proposed by:	Dinamik
Tagging:	restriction:hgv, restriction:caravan, restriction:motorcar, restriction:bus, restriction:agrucultural, restriction:bicycle, restriction:hazmat=
Applies to:
Definition:	sometimes we have a restrictive sign, that doesn't have exceptions, but has a sort of vehicles, for which this sign is operating; in such cases it is more comfortable to mark vehicles, for which sign is operating, not exceptions from restrictions
Rendered as:
Draft start:	2011-07-08
RFC start:	2011-07-08
Vote start:
Vote end:

Relation:Restriction - mark vehicles, for which restriction is operating (Variant III)
Status:	Abandoned (inactive)
Proposed by:	Dinamik
Tagging:	only=hgv, caravan, motorcar, bus, agricultural, motorcycle, bicycle, hazmat
Applies to:
Definition:	sometimes we have a restrictive sign, that doesn't have exceptions, but has a sort of vehicles, for which this sign is operating; in such cases it is more comfortable to mark vehicles, for which sign is operating, not exceptions from restrictions
Rendered as:
Draft start:	2011-07-05
RFC start:	2011-07-05
Vote start:
Vote end:

Relation:Restriction - mark vehicles, for which restriction is operating (Variant IV)
Status:	Abandoned (inactive)
Proposed by:	Dinamik
Tagging:	for=hgv, caravan, motorcar, bus, agricultural, motorcycle, bicycle, hazmat
Applies to:
Definition:	sometimes we have a restrictive sign, that doesn't have exceptions, but has a sort of vehicles, for which this sign is operating; in such cases it is more comfortable to mark vehicles, for which sign is operating, not exceptions from restrictions
Rendered as:
Draft start:	2011-07-05
RFC start:	2011-07-05
Vote start:
Vote end:

Description

Sometimes we have a restrictive sign, that doesn't have exceptions, but has a sort of vehicles, for which this sign is operating. It doesn't mean, that we have a part of road, which is prohibited for using: perhaps, we have a crossing with restriction for some actions for some vehicles. In such cases it is more comfortable to mark vehicles, for which sign is operating, not exceptions from restrictions.

Originally, tag for= was suggested, but remark was made, that in such case software, that doesn't know, how to work with new tag, will be thinking, that there is a restriction for all vehicles. If we use type=restriction:hgv, type=restriction:caravan, type=restriction:motorcar, type=restriction:bus, type=restriction:agricultural, type=restriction:motorcycle, type=restriction:bicycle, type=restriction:hazmat software, that doesn't know, how to work with new tag, will be thinking, that there is no any restriction for all vehicles. Another variant is using restriction:hvg=, restriction:caravan=, restriction:motorcar=, restriction:bus=, restriction:agricultural=, restriction:motorcycle=, restriction:bicycle=, restriction:hazmat=. Also there is tag only=, which is now used in indicated labels.

When commenting, please, mark: a) do you support and idea of marking vehicles, for which restriction is operating? b) do you support Variant I (type=restriction:hgv, type=restriction:caravan, type=restriction:motorcar, type=restriction:bus, type=restriction:agricultural, type=restriction:motorcycle, type=restriction:bicycle, type=restriction:hazmat)? c) do you support Variant II (restriction:hvg=, restriction:caravan=, restriction:motorcar=, restriction:bus=, restriction:agricultural=, restriction:motorcycle=, restriction:bicycle=, restriction:hazmat=)? d) do you support Variant III (only=)? e) do you support Variant IV (for=)?

Examples

Example 1:

Variant I:

type=restriction:hgv
restriction=no_u_turn

Variant II:

type=restriction
restriction:hgv=no_u_turn

Variant III:

type=restriction
restriction=no_u_turn
only=hgv

Variant IV:

type=restriction
restriction=no_u_turn
for=hgv

Example 2:

Variant I:

type=restriction:caravan
restriction=only_straight_on

Variant II:

type=restriction
restriction:caravan=only_straight_on

Variant III:

type=restriction
restriction=only_straight_on
only=caravan

Variant IV:

type=restriction
restriction=only_straight_on
for=caravan

Example 3:

Variant I:

type=restriction:motorcar
restriction=only_right_turn

Variant II:

type=restriction
restriction:motorcar=only_right_turn

Variant III:

type=restriction
restriction=only_right_turn
only=motorcar

Variant IV:

type=restriction
restriction=only_right_turn
for=motorcar

Example 4:

Variant I:

type=restriction:bus
restriction=no_right_turn

Variant II:

type=restriction
restriction:bus=no_right_turn

Variant III:

type=restriction
restriction=no_right_turn
only=bus

Variant IV:

type=restriction
restriction=no_right_turn
for=bus

Example 5:

Variant I:

type=restriction:agricultural
restriction=no_straight_on

Variant II:

type=restriction
restriction:agricultural=no_straght_on

Variant III:

type=restriction
restriction=no_straight_on
only=agricultural

Variant IV:

type=restriction
restriction=no_straight_on
for=agricultural

Example 6:

Variant I:

type=restriction:motorcycle=
restriction=only_left_turn

Variant II:

type=restriction
restriction:motorcycle=only_left_turn

Variant III:

type=restriction
restriction=only_left_turn
only=motorcycle

Variant IV:

type=restriction
restriction=only_left_turn
for=motorcycle

Example 7:

Variant I:

type=restriction:bicycle
restriction=no_left_turn

Variant II:

type=restriction
restriction:bicycle=no_left_turn

Variant III:

type=restriction
restriction=no_left_turn
only=bicycle

Variant IV:

type=restriction
restriction=no_left_turn
for=bicycle

Example 8:

Variant I:

type=restriction:hazmat
restriction=no_right_turn

Variant II:

type=restriction
restriction:hazmat=no_right_turn

Variant III:

type=restriction
restriction=no_right_turn
only=hazmat

Variant IV:

type=restriction
restriction=no_right_turn
for=hazmat

Voting (is not active)

Questions:
1) How do you think, can we have possibility to mark in restrictions not only exceptions from this restrictions, but types of vehicles, for which restriction is operating?
2a) Do you think, that Variant I (with using type=restriction:<type of vehicel>=) is acceptable?
2b) Do you think, that Variant II (with usung restriction:<type of vehicle>=) is acceptable?
2c) Do you think, that Varian III (with using tag only=) is acceptabel?
2d) Do you think, that Variant IV (with using tag for=) is acceptable?
2e) If you think, that we can have possibility to mark in restrictions not only exceptions from this restrictions, but types of vehicles, for which restriction is operating, but don't consider Variants I, II, III and IV acceptable, what realization do you suppose?