Proposed features/fuel

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
The Feature Page for the approved proposal Tag:amenity=fuel is located at Tag:amenity=fuel.


fuel
Status: Approved (active)
Proposed by: Serpens
Tagging: fuel:fuel_type=yes/no
Applies to: node/area
Definition: type of fuel in a filling station
Drafted on: 2006-06-09
RFC start: 2009-01-16
Vote start: 2009-04-24
Vote end: 2009-05-08

Tagging / Applies To

Applies to amenity=fuel, see also talk page there.

alternative fuels:

Maybe also amenity=bbq (see here) etc.?


Rendering preview

Tag Preview Remarks Name EN Name DE Name IT Name
fuel:diesel=yes/no fuel:diesel=yesedit Wikipedia Diesel Diesel Gasolio
fuel:HGV_diesel=yes/no fuel:HGV_diesel=yesedit (The station offers a special price for high amounts) LKW Diesel Gasolio alta portata
fuel:biodiesel=yes/no|

fuel:biodiesel=yesedit

Wikipedia US(?): FAME - fatty acid methyl ester
UK: "Bio-diesel"
Fettsäuremethylester: Biodiesel Biodiesel, non distribuito in Italia
fuel:svo=yes/no fuel:svo=yesedit Wikipedia Straight Vegetable Oil Pflanzenöl Olio vegetale, non distribuito in Italia
fuel:octane_91=yes/no fuel:octane_91=yesedit Wikipedia Gasoline/Petrol 91 Octane "Normal Bleifrei Benzin", "Normal Verbleit Benzin" Benzina normale, non distribuita in Italia
fuel:octane_95=yes/no fuel:octane_95=yesedit Wikipedia Eurosuper US?: Gasoline/Petrol 95 Octane
UK: "Unleaded"
"Super Bleifrei Benzin" Super senza Pb, benzina verde, benzina agricola
fuel:octane_98=yes fuel:octane_98=yesedit Wikipedia Superplus US?: Gasoline/Petrol 98 Octane Ies 98 plus, IP Plus 98, OMV Superplus 98,
fuel:octane_98_leaded=yes fuel:octane_98_leaded=yesedit Wikipedia Leaded 4-star "Super Plus verbleit Benzin" Non distribuita in Italia
fuel:octane_100=yes/no fuel:octane_100=yesedit Wikipedia Gasoline/Petrol 100 Octane Deutschland: "Shell V-Power, Aral Ultimate Benzin" (Österreich, Schweiz: auch "Super Plus" Achtung, anders in Deutschland!) Eni Blu Super+, Shell V-Power, Tamoil WR100
fuel:biogas=yes/no fuel:biogas=yesedit Wikipedia Methane Bioerdgas, Biomethan Non distribuito in Italia
fuel:lpg=yes/no fuel:lpg=yesedit Wikipedia LPG Autogas GPL
fuel:cng=yes/no fuel:cng=yesedit Wikipedia Compressed Natural Gas Erdgas Metano
fuel:LH2=yes/no fuel:LH2=yesedit Liquid Hydrogen Flüssiger Wasserstoff Non distribuito in Italia
fuel:e85=yes/no fuel:e85=yesedit Wikipedia Petrol with 85% Ethanol Non distribuita in Italia
fuel:1_25=yes/no fuel:1_25=yesedit Two-stroke 1:25 Zweitaktgemisch 1:25 Non distribuita in Italia
fuel:1_50=yes/no fuel:1_50=yesedit Two-stroke 1:50 Zweitaktgemisch 1:50 Non distribuita in Italia

Comments

Tag firstly proposed by User:Blk. He wants to name it for example fuel_hydrogen=yes. In my opinion it's better to name it fuel:hydrogen=yes. -- Serpens 09:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Although fuel_xyz is used much more often according to tagwatch I also like fuel:xyz more. It's more consistent with other notations. -- Andre68 12:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


How about writing all available types into only one tag?

fuel = diesel;octane_98;octane_100;biodiesel;lpg

this would also be more consistent with other tags, where multiple features are available. --D.S.E 10:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't really like this, I prefer fuel:xyz=yes. Similiar to amenity=recycling. -- Serpens 21:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Multiple values in a tag are usually a bad idea, as they make it much harder to, say, select all places selling diesel. Database queries and rendering styles work better with separate tags, and you can naturally translate them into preference check boxes.
Someone planning to start a poll/vote on this? --Tordanik 20:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
I agree, mutliple values are a bad idea. If I see fuel_LPG=yes/no I know someone has checked it, if I see fuel=Diesel;octane_XY I don't know if I need to check for LPG. Separate tags make it easier to check for special types, which are the only interesting at all IMHO. --Lulu-Ann 08:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely ACK. So we should still decide between "fuel_lpg=yes" and "fuel:lpg=yes" (which I prefer, it is similar to Karlsruhe Schema, payment:foo, amenity=recycling etc.). -- Serpens 18:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

The word octane could lead to confusion, as different countries use different ratings to derive the number on the pump. See Octane rating. -- Dormin 19:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Hm, that's difficult. European filling stations we can easily tag with "RON" rating. But what to do with Canadian and US fuels? Also RON?
What about that voting mode? -- Serpens 15:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
With the clear percentage for "fuel:xyz=yes" this proposal is now ready for voting. -- Serpens 17:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Voting

Voting has ended and was successful

  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Skippern 17:27, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- ck3d 18:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Tordanik 12:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Vrabcak 07:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- xylome 08:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- sadam 11:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. This doesn't take into account places that have different octanes, or places that do not have gasoline stations at all, only E10 stations (such as the entire state of Oregon). This is a good idea, but as currently drafted, wrongly executed. -- Paul Johnson 17:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- Serpens 09:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC) Paul Johnson: There is absolutely no problem to add more fuel:whatever=yes tags e.g. fuel:e10=yes. This proposal is only about the general fuel:abc=yes syntax.
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- Apo42 16:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- EtienneChove 16:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- Bmichel 17:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- Ckruetze 08:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- Helmut K 09:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC) make more sense for lpg/cng/biogas...
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Lulu-Ann 23:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Voting has ended and was successful