User talk:Pmailkeey still

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Alternative highway classification

Hi Pmailkeey, what should the page Alternative highway classification be? A forum/mailing list post? Wrong place then! ;-) A docu wiki entry? hmm. links? category? And... shouldn't this rather be a subpage of your user page? Similar at Road markings. Happy mapping! --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 01:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

I need a place to put forward suggestions for doing the mapping properly and allowing others to see the discussion so that the map can be improved by showing relevant data rather than showing duplicated data in different ways - which is pointless and of little use to map users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmailkeey_still (talkcontribs)
While it's in an early stage, it's probably better to move it to User:Pmailkeey still/Alternative highway classification. When it gets in a good shape and you verify that the british community agrees with your page, then we can move it to a page such as Highway classification in UK or something like that.--Jgpacker (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

trunk photo

Hi Pmailkeey, what did you wanted to achieve with this edit? See also the comment at my following revert. --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 22:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

I thought it'd be useful to have a correct image. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmailkeey_still (talkcontribs)
As far as I can tell, the previous image wasn't wrong. It may not be representative of every trunk road, but that's to be expected; it can look many ways. At the very least, it shouldn't look the same as a primary road --Jgpacker (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
The 'trunk' image is of a dual carriageway but the rendered graphic is of a single carriageway. The two combo is wrong - and I decided it was the photo that was actually wrong as the table entry refers to the road type which is not specifically dual carriageway. I'd be happy if another rendered graphic showed a dual carriageway (inc. direction arrows) and the existing image was used as well as the single carriageway example.
Even if this is a wrong photo, then you also need to change the photo for "primary". Having the same(!) photo for two different(!) highway types (primary AND trunk) is not right. If you want to change the photo, which is there for a long time already, please open a discussion on the talk page. --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 09:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)