Proposed features/Practical maxspeed
From OpenStreetMap Wiki
| Practical maxspeed | |
|---|---|
| Status: | Rejected (inactive) |
| Proposed by: | erkinalp |
| Tagging: | practical maxspeed=* |
| Applies to: | linear |
| Definition: | maxspeed in practice |
| Rendered as: | not rendered except for maxspeed map but parsed |
| Draft start: | 2009-09-05 |
| RFC start: | 2009-09-05 |
| Vote start: | 2009-09-19 |
| Vote end: | 2009-10-04 |
I propose practical maxspeed for routing and for rendering (on Max Speed map).erkinalp
Contents |
Rationale
To map practical(for time estimation) and legal(for penalty calculation) speed limits seperately
Practical does not equal "what is physically possible", which varies by vehicle, but roughly a median speed.
Tagging
maxspeed:practical=90;nighttime:100 You can drive up to 90 km/h practically for days, but you can drive up to 100 km/h practically at nights.
maxspeed:practical=90;rushhour:20 You can drive up to 90 km/h practically for days, but you can drive up to 20 km/h in the rush hour time.
maxspeed:practical=90;unenforced:120 You can drive up to 90 km/h practically because of enforcement but 120 km/h is possible when not enforced by police.
Voting
- I oppose this proposal. Not sensible tagging scheme. --Skippern 03:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal, proposalmaker. An already documented feature in Key:Maxspeed. --erkinalp 13:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. --Michi 21:19, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. practical maxspeed depends heavily on weather condition and what car you're using --Zartbitter 15:10 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal., possible maxspeed depens on vehicle weight. Here I would not rely on data collected by another person with another vehicle. This is even no acurate value in reality. I like the idea of rushhour maxspeed. But also not a concret value and I'm much faster with my bike than other with their cars in rushhour. Hmm, I vote no. --Bahnpirat 17:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. -- Dieterdreist 10:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. --turbodog 22:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC) The conditions are too variable to establish a meaningful number except, possibly, in extremely rare situations.
- I oppose this proposal. Use maxspeed... or make it more clear in which caeses pratical maxspeed should be used... --Islanit 06:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. Absolutely pointless. Every mapper would tag this different, because everyone thinks there is a different "practical" maxspeed. Why should we want to tag this? --Willem1 16:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. Everthing has been said, its different for every mapper. --Bürste 21:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- I oppose this proposal. I don't see how this can be measured objectively ... --Tessarakt2 14:49, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. my region has many places where 100 km/h is allowed, but definitely not advisable. --Kenji 23:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- I approve this proposal. for Kenji reason - Stéphane 19:17, 18 April 2012 (BST)
See also
