User talk:Javnik
Przystanki autobusowe
//taki syf...ale potem się trzeba będzie tym zająć
Dam tutaj taki mały rendering przystanków może komuś pomoże.
bus_stop z route_ref
bus_stop i stop_position z towards
bus_stop i stop_position z name
Wg. tego w 'aglomeracji' mamy ...przystanków, 485 ma route_ref, ...ma name, 470 ma towards
Ułatwienia dla niewidomych
23 grudnia 2009 Zakład Energetyki Trakcyjnej i Torów spółki Tramwaje Warszawskie przysłał mi na potrzeby OSM listę przystanków z ułatwieniami dla niewidomych w postaci pasu płytek chodnikowych z wypustkami, na podstawie której zostały dodane tagi tactile_paving=yes/no. Lista była wydrukowana na 16 stronach, w celu dokumentacji jest wklejona na stronie poniżej:
Zrzuty ekranu
Hej,
Jeśli idzie o zrzuty do Warszawa w 3D, to chyba trzeba się ograniczyć do OSMB i OSM2W, bo są na wolnych licencjach, więc pewnie i zrzuty można zrobić na tych samych - w przypadku F4 nie wiem, czy ich licencja pozwala na publikowanie zrzutów. Kocio (talk) 21:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Moim zdaniem najbezpieczniej wywalić jednak F4 - nieznana licencja to tak samo jak nie podanie żadnej. Panoramę można przecież walnąć w K3D, jak się trochę danych z terenu zassie. Natomiast OSM2W jest tak słabe, że nie widzę głębszego sensu, żeby się mu przyglądać na razie. Kocio (talk) 23:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:AfterAH-DomissStyle-w desc.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified January 2022}} from the file page.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Do you remember which aerial imagery was used in this file?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:BeforeAH-geop-middle.png - do you know which aerial imagery you used here to make this screenshot? 13:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:MotorwayCrossing.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Javnik}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, August}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)