Proposal:Mark vehicles, for which restriction is operating
| Relation:Restriction - mark vehicles, for which restriction is operating (Variant I) | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Abandoned (inactive) |
| Proposed by: | Dinamik |
| Tagging: | restriction=* |
| Applies to: | 
|
| Definition: | sometimes we have a restrictive sign, that doesn't have exceptions, but has a sort of vehicles, for which this sign is operating; in such cases it is more comfortable to mark vehicles, for which sign is operating, not exceptions from restrictions |
| Statistics: |
|
| Draft started: | 2011-07-05 |
| RFC start: | 2011-07-05 |
| Relation:Restriction - mark vehicles, for which restriction is operating (Variant II) | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Abandoned (inactive) |
| Proposed by: | Dinamik |
| Tagging: | restriction:hgv, restriction:caravan, restriction:motorcar, restriction:bus, restriction:agrucultural, restriction:bicycle, restriction:hazmat=* |
| Applies to: |
|
| Definition: | sometimes we have a restrictive sign, that doesn't have exceptions, but has a sort of vehicles, for which this sign is operating; in such cases it is more comfortable to mark vehicles, for which sign is operating, not exceptions from restrictions |
| Statistics: |
|
| Draft started: | 2011-07-08 |
| RFC start: | 2011-07-08 |
Description
Sometimes we have a restrictive sign, that doesn't have exceptions, but has a sort of vehicles, for which this sign is operating. It doesn't mean, that we have a part of road, which is prohibited for using: perhaps, we have a crossing with restriction for some actions for some vehicles. In such cases it is more comfortable to mark vehicles, for which sign is operating, not exceptions from restrictions.
Originally, tag for= was suggested, but remark was made, that in such case software, that doesn't know, how to work with new tag, will be thinking, that there is a restriction for all vehicles. If we use type=restriction:hgv, type=restriction:caravan, type=restriction:motorcar, type=restriction:bus, type=restriction:agricultural, type=restriction:motorcycle, type=restriction:bicycle, type=restriction:hazmat software, that doesn't know, how to work with new tag, will be thinking, that there is no any restriction for all vehicles.
When commenting, please, mark: a) do you support and idea of marking vehicles, for which restriction is operating? b) do you support Variant I (type=restriction:hgv, type=restriction:caravan, type=restriction:motorcar, type=restriction:bus, type=restriction:agricultural, type=restriction:motorcycle, type=restriction:bicycle, type=restriction:hazmat)? c) do you support Variant II (restriction:hvg=, restriction:caravan=, restriction:motorcar=, restriction:bus=, restriction:agricultural=, restriction:motorcycle=, restriction:bicycle=, restriction:hazmat=)?
Examples
Example 1:
Variant I:
type=restriction:hgv restriction=no_u_turn
Variant II:
type=restriction restriction:hgv=no_u_turn
Example 2:
Variant I:
type=restriction:caravan restriction=only_straight_on
Variant II:
type=restriction restriction:caravan=only_straight_on
Example 3:
Variant I:
type=restriction:motorcar restriction=only_right_turn
Variant II:
type=restriction restriction:motorcar=only_right_turn
Example 4:
Variant I:
type=restriction:bus restriction=no_right_turn
Variant II:
type=restriction restriction:bus=no_right_turn
Example 5:
Variant I:
type=restriction:agricultural restriction=no_straight_on
Variant II:
type=restriction restriction:agricultural=no_straght_on
Example 6:
Variant I:
type=restriction:motorcycle= restriction=only_left_turn
Variant II:
type=restriction restriction:motorcycle=only_left_turn
Example 7:
Variant I:
type=restriction:bicycle restriction=no_left_turn
Variant II:
type=restriction restriction:bicycle=no_left_turn
Example 8:
Variant I:
type=restriction:hazmat restriction=no_right_turn
Variant II:
type=restriction restriction:hazmat=no_right_turn
Voting (is not active)
Questions:
1) How do you think, can we have possibility to mark in restrictions not only exceptions from this restrictions, but types of vehicles, for which restriction is operating?
2a) Do you think, that Variant I (with using type=restriction:<type of vehicel>=) is acceptable?
2b) Do you think, that Variant II (with usung restriction:<type of vehicle>=) is acceptable?
2c) If you think, that we can have possibility to mark in restrictions not only exceptions from this restrictions, but types of vehicles, for which restriction is operating, but don't consider Variants I, II, III and IV acceptable, what realization do you suppose?