The wiki page describes how to handle split exits properly - which were not handled correctly in the US
Does this tagging apply to entrances too? E.g. from a tertiary road onto a motorway, where there is a sign directing drivers to the motorway? --ElliottPlack (talk) 12:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes - I will try to add some examples --Duaneg (talk) 20:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
When the exit ramp diverges at the end, would the way tagging apply to both branches? Would this qualify for street:to tagging on the upstream motorway_link?
Do you have a picture of signage at the ramp split?
Typically one ramp would have destination=Butler and the other ramp would have destination=Sparks
Isn't the tag highway=motorway_junction the defacto way of tagging highway exits? You should present this page to the tagging mailing list, if you are not doing so already. --Jgpacker (talk) 17:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm not convinced of the :to extension.
|destination:ref (proposed)||<branch route number>|
|destination:ref:to (proposed)||<toward route number>|
|destination:street (proposed)||<branch road name>|
|destination:street:to (proposed)||<toward road name>|
There is a mixing of semantics here - "destination" is "toward" but "destination:ref" should only be "branch route number". This seems to be against Proposed_features/Destination_details#destination:ref where is states The key destination:ref=* should be used to specify the reference of the roads ahead. What exactly is "<branch route number>"?--Jojo4u (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think I see what happened up there. The page does specify what that means lower in the page: '<branch route number>: The route number that the exit/ramp/slip road will branch onto', and '<toward route number>: The route number that the exit/ramp/slip road will head toward'. I personally agree that the wording is awkward, but the principle is sound. In the United States, it is fairly common for motorway guidance signs to show 'the reference of the road you are exiting to' as well as 'a major nearby road that road also leads to'. In the image below...
- For exit 51B, the destination:ref is 'I 81 North'. The slip road connects directly to Interstate 81 North. The destination:ref:to is 'I 78'. The slip road does not connect directly to Interstate 78 at all, but the symbol and "TO" is provided as a guidance to the driver, and will be seen by the driver on the destination sign. There is probably a better word than 'branch' to use there, but the use is sensible. Skybunny (talk) 17:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Split exit refs
"A/B Split Example" suggests tagging ref=51A-B on the highway=motorway_junction node. This could be confusing, because an exit number in another country may include a hyphen. Instead, we should delimit multiple values according to OSM convention: ref=51A;51B. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 17:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- We should also mention the ref:left=51A & ref:right=51B option on the front page for the highway=motorway_junction node. That will allow router to know properly which exit number goes to which ramp. See: Proposed features/motorway junction Extension -- rickmastfan67 (talk) 01:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- If the notion ref=51A-B is unique to OSM I also propose to use semicolons.--Jojo4u (talk) 19:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
This page is really helpful for complicated exits but when dealing with a much simpler exit where the sign only states the destination street, would it be better to put the name of the street in the destination tag? Zian (talk) 03:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)