User talk:Jojo4u

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

On the covered=* page, I tried to fix some of the phrasing to make it clearer English, but was not sure exactly what was meant by the note about using layer=* at the end of the Usage section. Please take a look and correct it if necessary or let me know if I got it wrong. Thanks! Neuhausr (talk) 15:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

unclassified/residential

Thanks for noticing! Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

exit_to deprecation

I added a response on the Talk:Tag:highway=motorway_junction page, thank you! Skybunny (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Namespace template hacks

Hi, I have started working on an implementation to see how difficult it would be, if you have some knowledge in hacking templates have a look at User:RicoZ#Template_hacks. For now I have the problem that my Template:NamespacePagename function isn't invoked, which might be the result of using a personal namespace or some silly typo of me. RicoZ (talk) 15:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

I think I fixed that with User:RicoZ/Template:NamespacePagename.--Jojo4u (talk) 19:47, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
The explanation: Note that when using braces {{...}}, the page to be transcluded defaults to the Template: namespace if no other namespace is specified. To transclude a page in another namespace, the full pagename must be specified.--Jojo4u (talk) 20:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks:) So it might be easier than I feared to get something working. Now we need to figure out what exactly it should do. Should it be separate templates for prefix/infix/suffix, what should be the page names?RicoZ (talk) 21:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure, for the beginning we could start with "NamespaceDescription" and type=prefix/postfix. Infix is really rare, I would skip it for now.--Jojo4u (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

deprecated name tags

hey, warum hast du die info zu name_1 alt_name_1 von key:names gelöscht? Hakuch (talk) 08:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Weil es alle "Names" betrifft und damit ist es zu Names#Deprecated_tags gewandert. In der List der Key/Values steht es ja weiterhin drin: "Do not use this tag, suffixed name tagging for multiple values is deprecated."--Jojo4u (talk) 09:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

(highway=path) != Radweg

I believe that is too simple: [1] #1. Highway=path in extra urban areas might be alpinist hiking paths or whatever else. And I don't have any idea how to do it better, this table is next to useless anyway. RicoZ (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Du sprichst doch auch Deutsch, oder? An alpinen Wanderwegen steht kein bicycle=designated am highway=path. So ist nun mal das in Deutschland breit verwendete Tag für Radwege wo Fußgänger mitmischen (Zeichen 240/241).
Die Tabelle zeigt eher die gesamte Komplexität als ein Regelwerk für Router zu bilden. Keiner erwartet dass ein Router alles beherzigt. Aber ein Router kann eine Grundmenge bilden und zusätzlich für ihn wichtige Länder manche Regeln beherzigen.--Jojo4u (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, habe das bicycle=designated übersehen. RicoZ (talk) 11:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Don't redirect pages to be deleted

Please don't do this. When you do, taginfo will show the description from the infobox of the page it redirects to and nothing to indicate that the tag should be phased out so it is very easy to miss that when someone is not paying too much attention. Ach verflixt .. ich vergesse immer wieder, daß ich auch Deutsch kann RicoZ (talk) 21:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok danke für den Hinweis. Aber ist das noch so? Vielleicht verhindert das Template:Delete es bei dem Artikel. Datenstand 6.6. 00:58 Uhr und Wikiseite von Taginfo leer [2]. Das Problem hätten dann aber einige andere Artikel von Deprecated features.--Jojo4u (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Ich glaube Taginfo erkennt mittlerweile Redirect: [3] vs [4] oder [5] vs [6]--Jojo4u (talk) 22:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Das wäre sehr erfreulich, mal http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/bridge=beam#wiki einige Tage im Auge behalten.. weiß nicht wie oft da im wiki nachgeschaut wird. Aber wäre die alte Infobox mit der expliziten Beschreibung "description=obsolete, use bridge=yes + bridge:structure=beam " nicht trotzdem besser? Übrigens ist die usage jetzt so nahe bei Null .. sollte vermutlich endgültig gelöscht werden.
Ich habe nur die von dir gewünschte Löschung vorangetrieben mit dem vorgeschriebenen "Leer machen". Obsolete ist zwar in den Templates ([7]) aber nie verwendet ([8]), ich würde Template:Discouraged verwenden.--Jojo4u (talk) 13:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)