Attribution/data.gov.au explicit permission
In September-October 2011, I had correspondance with data.gov.au where I explictly pointed out we are moving to another license specifically written for open data, that it might not jive with CC-BY and that they may not be happy with the provisions for downstream attributions. I asked them if they could explictly give us permission to continue use or if we should remove it. The conclusion was that we can continue as per an attribution statement I drafted with their input. This actively reviewed by data.gov.au to their satisfaction and they have kindly confirmed such in an email message that I am allowed to publish as copied below, (email headers at the bottom). MikeCollinson 15:21, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your email.
The attribution statement
“Contains data from Australian government public information datasets. The original datasets are available from the Australian government data website under Creative Commons - Attribution 2.5 Australia (CC-BY) and Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC-BY). We have also been given explicit permission to incorporate and publish such CC-BY licensed geographic coordinate datasets under a free and open license, including the Open Database License, provided that primary attribution is made here and that each dataset used is also listed here in the format Dataset Name, Date Published, License, Agency Name, originally retrieved from http://data.australia.gov.au: “
accurately reflects what we have said.
Return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Envelope-to: email@example.com Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:48:15 -0700 Received: from [188.8.131.52] (helo=ottawa.sge.net) by host218.hostmonster.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <firstname.lastname@example.org>) id 1RQIQt-0000yT-SP for email@example.com; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:48:15 -0700 Received: from virginia.fys.gwy (unknown [172.30.1.66]) by ottawa.sge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B74F1A36 for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from virginia.fys.gwy (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA80 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615841F8035 for <email@example.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spamfilter.finance.gov.au (unknown [184.108.40.206]) by virginia.fys.gwy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BF81F8031 for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spamfilter.finance.gov.au ([220.127.116.11]) by skoda1.off.gwy for <email@example.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:48:09 +0000 Received: from pvw9finht32 [18.104.22.168] by spamfilter.finance.gov.au - Websense Email Security (6.1.1); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:48:07 +1100 Received: from PCW9FINMB03.mercury.network ([169.254.1.144]) by PVW9FINHT32.mercury.network ([22.214.171.124]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:48:07 +1100 From: data.gov <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: 'Michael Collinson' <email@example.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:48:06 +1100 Subject: RE: Data.gov.au feedback [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Thread-Topic: Data.gov.au feedback [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Thread-Index: AcyjgmP0+37ztAQARRWARxdgM/egWwAEj5LA Message-ID: <20FD9C4C0F47EA4B8E9DE659AE8F6CD2660967DCE8@PCW9FINMB03.mercury.network> References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20FD9C4C0F47EA4B8E9DE659AE8F6CD264DC2EF6E9@PCW9FINMB03.mercury.network> <4E7B3969.email@example.com> <20FD9C4C0F47EA4B8E9DE659AE8F6CD264DC5E8406@PCW9FINMB03.mercury.network> <4E9D83C5.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20FD9C4C0F47EA4B8E9DE659AE8F6CD264E44A838D@PCW9FINMB03.mercury.network> <4EC2408E.email@example.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC2408E.firstname.lastname@example.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-sec-fullclassification: UNCLASSIFIED/#/# x-protective-marking: VER=2005.6, NS=gov.au, SEC=UNCLASSIFIED, ORIGIN=Lisa.Cornish@finance.gov.au x-sec-classification: 1 - UNCLASSIFIED x-titus-version: 2.71.23 x-sec-original-classification: UNCLASSIFIED#/#