Talk:Import/City of Grand Junction, Colorado Buildings
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Processing Issues
I've taken a quick look at the processed data (I haven't looked at the unprocessed data yet)
- Multipolygon buildings have an "inner" building. For example, the processed building for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231501153 has two buildings where the inner polygons are. This is probably a processing issue.
- Most buildings are `building=yes`. When I looked at the 2015 buildings (this was before the 2020 buildings were released, which is what you are using), they had specific types for `building=house`, `building=static_caravan`, etc. I doubt this changed between the 2015 and 2020 building datasets, but I would have to check. I'll try to do that tonight, so I can post a suggested mapping. But no guarantees.
Vorpalblade77 (talk) 11:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Suggested Specific mappings
- `Type=Mobile Home` -> Tag:building=static_caravan
- `Type=Residential` -> Tag:building=residential -- while not as specific as it could be, it at least gives the mapper a hint of what it should be (mostly useful for apartment buildings).
- `Type=Unknown` -> Tag:building=yes
- `Type=Out Building` -> Tag:building=yes (I don't know of a specific type for this, but most are going to be `building=shed`, some will probably `building=garage`)
- `Type=Trailer` -> I'm not certain this should be included, but I'll have to check some of them.
- `Type=Barn` -> Tag:building=barn
- `Type=Commercial` -> Tag:building=commercial
- `Type=Public` -> Tag:building=government
- `Type=Industrial` -> Tag:building=industrial
- `Type=Courtyard` -> This should be a multipolygon role=inner. The enclosing building should have role=outer in the multipolygon.
Vorpalblade77 (talk) 12:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
---
Vorpalblade77, thanks for the feedback! I have shared with my colleagues and we are reviewing now. We'll add comments to this discussion after our review.