Proposal talk:Lane

Access restrictions

I'd like to see this as part of the proposed Access restriction page. What's described there should be sufficient to do whatever this lane relation could do, but in a cleaner way IMHO. If I forgot anything in the access restrictions proposal that's possible in this lane proposal, please mention it there. --Eimai 13:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

This proposal is definitely not a subset of access restrictions. -- Eckhart 19:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

In that case I got a bit blinded by the "oneway / width / hgv=yes/no motorcar=yes/no bicycle=yes/no" in the table... So this proposal wants to add things like surface, road width etc? Have to make up my mind yet if that would be a good thing to have in a relation then, or whether it would be better done as structured tags. --Eimai 19:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

If you have a look at the use cases you can see that there is a use case "Lanes going to different directions" which is impossible to do using only structured tags, as it involves referencing the target. The proposal does not fit the use cases atm though - I only added them recently. -- Eckhart 21:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I think this is needed, as I can't find any way of presently representing a contra-flow bus lane! If anyone here knows better, please say... --CunningPlan 13:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Intersections/Turn Restrictions

How to mark various lanes with various turn restrictions?

only_left_turn|only_straight|only_right_turn?

--Skippern 13:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Maybe include the lane relation as a from/to member of a Relation:restriction? --Hai-Etlik 01:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Before that can be done, a working lane relation must be in place, also I would like the editing tools (such as JOSM) to handle it good. At the moment there is no way to separate the lanes for that sort of relations. As far as I know, other restrictions, such as change of lane are not handled either. That means that a routing software does not get any information about where it have to choose lane. --Skippern 11:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)