User:Pintoch/SmokingCountries

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This table is an attempt to answer the question: In which countries is the smoking= tag informative when added to bars, cafés and other hospitality places?

Motivation

Many countries have adopted strict bans on indoor smoking in hospitality places. In such countries, adding smoking=outside to the OSM node of a café is not super useful as it is already implied by the legislation. It adds redundant information that will likely not be useful to an end user consulting it. In some other countries however, this smoking status can be valuable information, both for smokers and non-smokers, when choosing a place where to spend some time out.

My interest in conducting this small survey is to provide an overview of the where the smoking=* tag is useful, with the intention to help:

  • designers of OpenStreetMap front-ends (such as mobile apps) who want to decide if and how to render the smoking=* tag to users
  • designers of OpenStreetMap editing software who want to decide how prominently they should encourage contributors to enter this information
  • OpenStreetMap contributors interested in increasing the coverage of the smoking=* tag in places where it is most useful

Methodology

The question above is clearly ill-defined so there is no clear-cut criterion to determine if smoking information is "useful" in a country or not. Getting a precise estimation would ideally require surveying users in each country, asking them if this information is useful to them. I would be interested to know of any avenues to conduct such a survey.

More generally, any feedback on the methodology and suggestions of other indicators would be very welcome in the Discussion page.

In the absence of such a systematic survey, I have tried to exploit the following indicators to get a rough guess of the status for various countries:

  • number of uses of smoking=* in the country. The heuristic here is to expect that if the smoking status is relevant, the local community will use this tag more than in other places. I have restricted the uses of this tag on amenity=* nodes, ways and relations, as a way to restrict the indicator to a relatively broad super-class of hospitality places.
  • the proportion of those which are not smoking=no or smoking=outside. The heuristic here is to expect that in places with an enforced and comprehensive smoking ban, this proportion will be negligible, and so the question of whether indoor smoking is allowed isn't relevant locally. Note that this has an obvious sampling bias problem: OSM contributors are intuitively more likely to add smoking=* when its value is noteworthy. Also, there are places that are outdoors-only in which case smoking=yes does not imply indoor smoking.
  • the number of distinct StreetComplete users who have used the app to add smoking information to places, measured over a one year period. The heuristic here is to expect that more people use StreetComplete to add smoking information if it's a relevant information on the ground. The smoking quest is not enabled by default in StreetComplete so users need to explicitly opt in to start gathering this information. Also, this is a quest that often requires going inside buildings and possibly ask questions to staff if the smoking status isn't displayed clearly or obvious from the smell, so if contributors are adding this information I expect them to be rather motivated.
  • the same number, as a proportion of the overall number of StreetComplete users in the country over that period. This is intended to compensate for the differences in popularity of the app depending the region.
  • a quick online survey of the smoking legislation in the country, generally taken from Wikipedia's List of smoking bans or tobaccocontrollaws.org. This is rather difficult to exploit because information is often outdated or difficult to interpret. Legislation is not always reliably enforced and may not reflect the reality on the ground.
  • in some cases, the answer of a prominent StreetComplete contributor in that country to the question of whether this information is relevant in that country and whether the smoking quest would be worth enabling by default there

Considering all those indicators, I added a yes/no guess of whether the information is relevant in the country. Feel free to edit if you disagree!

Table

country code smoking tag occurrences of which "indoor" smoking StreetComplete smoking contributors As % Is smoking status useful info? Confirmed by SC user Note Legal status Example changeset
DE 23588 19,32% 330 3,76% only in some Bundesländer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoking_in_Germany https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145742687
US 14656 3,78% 54 1,87% only in some federal states? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans_in_the_United_States https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145718116
FR 7259 3,94% 75 1,69% no in overseas territories, the ban does not seem enforced as much https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145675578
ES 5585 4,35% 30 2,43% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Spain https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145625285
GB 5026 3,86% 27 1,66% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#United_Kingdom https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145703971
IT 4916 8,06% 31 1,83% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Italy https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145735524
JP 4606 51,67% 4 2,13% yes Jeoriga some prefectures have a ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Japan https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145646288
RU 3287 15,85% 11 1,77% no banned in gastromony since 2014 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Russia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145659673
CA 3003 1,27% 16 2,39% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Canada https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145681175
AT 2828 38,83% 34 2,68% no mcliquid 2019 ban – OSM data likely outdated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Austria https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145652414
BR 2476 13,61% 7 2,40% no? 2014 ban – OSM data likely outdated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Brazil https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/142728705
CZ 2178 29,48% 14 2,36% no? 2017 ban – OSM data likely outdated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Czech_Republic https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/144223193
VE 1943 3,40% 0 0,00% no 2011 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Venezuela
CH 1899 15,22% 18 1,98% no 1ucian0 2010 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Switzerland https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145067926
IN 1846 18,09% 4 1,56% no? 2018 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#India https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145731495
PL 1835 12,75% 27 2,45% no 2010 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Poland https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145715286
SE 1820 0,82% 10 1,56% no 2005 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Poland https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145732688
AU 1775 7,72% 10 2,07% no bans in most states https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Australia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145722553
PT 1757 20,89% 14 3,31% no rui228 2008 ban only loosely enforced in bars? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Portugal https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145682282
PH 1542 8,11% 0 0,00% no 2017 smoking ban – OSM data likely outdated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Philippines
KR 1494 3,82% 2 2,94% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#South_Korea https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145485970
TW 1438 7,58% 1 2,00% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Taiwan_(Republic_of_China) https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145245448
NL 1314 9,06% 22 1,95% no recent stricter bans − OSM data likely outdated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Netherlands https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145622328
AL 1254 10,05% 2 3,92% no ban enforced since 2013 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Albania https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/142142249
UA 1163 21,84% 2 1,44% no ban since 2006 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Uruguay https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145542780
HU 1135 7,31% 12 4,40% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Hungary https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145444762
ID 1116 59,77% 5 5,32% yes MJ McD 2006 ban only loosely enforced https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Indonesia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145649476
TH 1086 15,47% 2 1,37% no 2008 ban is mostly followed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Thailand https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133033131
BE 989 8,80% 10 1,31% no 2011 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Belgium https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143577078
MX 911 21,62% 2 1,31% yes 2008 ban loosely enforced in bars, clubs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Mexico https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143994161
DK 883 40,66% 15 2,65% yes 2007 light ban only loosely enforecd https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Denmark https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145228144
IE 856 10,86% 2 1,05% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Ireland https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/140958042
CN 827 16,32% 2 1,74% no? 2015 ban, enforcement unclear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#China_(People's_Republic_of_China) https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145722041
SK 823 40,46% 5 2,45% yes still allowed in bars, clubs, loose ban on restaurants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Slovakia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145698371
GR 818 37,78% 6 1,78% no tadams 2019 ban − OSM data likely outdated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Greece https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/144089798
AR 815 14,97% 1 0,81% no 2011 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Argentina https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/140074193
TR 790 32,53% 2 1,03% no? 2009 ban, enforcement unclear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Turkey https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/144638417
HR 665 60,75% 6 1,87% yes mnalis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Croatia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143845603
FI 661 5,90% 9 2,88% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Finland https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145182405
RO 650 27,23% 5 2,92% no alexnder “bars and restaurants may be designated as either smoke-free or exclusively for smokers” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Romania https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145585660
AE 648 4,48% 2 6,45% yes? English Wikipedia entry outdated https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/united-arab-emirates https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145744803
CO 490 18,16% 1 0,88% no 2009 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Colombia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/141895564
RS 478 75,31% 6 4,41% yes homocomputeris smoking areas in bars allowed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Serbia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145291639
BY 468 20,51% 3 3,09% yes smoking areas in bars allowed https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/belarus https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/142578441
BG 444 27,03% 3 3,26% yes smoking areas in restaurants allowed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Bulgaria https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/140729032
MY 395 23,29% 0 0,00% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Malaysia
VN 374 54,01% 2 4,00% yes allowed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Vietnam https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/144118932
NO 358 2,51% 2 0,60% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Norway https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/138373159
BO 352 11,08% 2 3,33% no? seems banned https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/bolivia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143167671
NP 318 62,89% 1 3,13% yes? high rate of indoor smoking tagged in OSM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Nepal https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/140680613
EC 316 20,25% 0 0,00% yes smoking common in bars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Ecuador
IR 314 29,30% 1 1,45% no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Iran https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/136758360
CL 298 15,44% 1 1,39% no 2013 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Chile https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133403749
BA 279 87,46% 2 3,57% no? 2023 ban https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/bosnia-and-herzegovina/laws https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145539647
SI 265 6,04% 2 1,05% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Slovenia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/138613985
ZA 257 33,85% 1 1,52% no? 2007 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#South_Africa https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/144467077
PE 241 23,24% 1 1,28% no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Peru https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/141573511
SG 224 13,84% 0 0,00% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Singapore
KZ 219 29,22% 1 2,44% yes Timur_14 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Kazakhstan https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/134973710
CU 215 53,49% 1 5,56% yes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Cuba https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143660218
BD 209 19,62% 1 4,76% ? https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/bangladesh https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/132740958
NZ 206 10,68% 2 1,53% no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#New_Zealand https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145557593
MM 194 67,01% 0 0,00% yes? https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/myanmar/summary
CR 193 5,18% 1 5,56% no? “one of the strictest bans in the world” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Costa_Rica https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/144513139
MA 189 60,32% 0 0,00% yes? high rate and not signatory of WHO framework https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/morocco
TN 183 83,61% 1 6,25% yes Nizar Kerkeni high rate ? https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143266502
AM 181 47,51% 1 2,78% no? 2022 ban https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Armenia https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143438715
CY 172 35,47% 0 0,00% ? unclear situation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans#Cyprus
XK 164 37,20% 0 0,00% ? ban in place https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/kosovo
UZ 158 53,80% 2 6,90% yes? some ban in place, unclear enforcement https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/legislation/uzbekistan https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145480942
DZ 157 57,32% 1 4,76% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/131230674
LK 145 13,79% 0 0,00%
LT 142 8,45% 2 2,06% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/144535624
MK 135 37,04% 2 8,00% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/145535616
IL 126 17,46% 2 1,85% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/141117395
EG 124 61,29% 2 4,55% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/138902646
TZ 120 43,33% 1 2,56% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/141983843
LU 120 1,67% 1 0,91% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/139512295
PK 114 26,32% 0 0,00%
KG 111 38,74% 0 0,00%
LV 108 7,41% 3 3,41% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/144772633
CI 104 18,27% 0 0,00%
UY 104 5,77% 0 0,00%
GE 104 47,12% 2 2,63% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/141264163
KH 101 35,64% 0 0,00%
HT 101 67,33% 0 0,00%
NI 91 64,84% 0 0,00%
EE 89 8,99% 3 4,17% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/141594419
GT 81 25,93% 0 0,00%
ME 79 55,70% 2 2,82% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143466633
GH 77 22,08% 1 4,76% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/137232379
IQ 75 58,67% 2 22,22% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143859357
SA 74 14,86% 0 0,00%
LC 72 22,22% #N/D #N/D #N/D
NG 71 36,62% 0 0,00%
IS 70 5,71% 0 0,00%
LA 69 34,78% 0 0,00%
JO 66 43,94% 1 7,14% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/137715427
DO 62 27,42% 0 0,00%
SN 61 50,82% 0 0,00%
KE 56 44,64% 1 5,26% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/134723025
TT 54 22,22% 0 0,00%
UG 51 23,53% 0 0,00%
PY 49 34,69% 0 0,00%
AZ 49 79,59% 0 0,00%
MT 48 14,58% 1 2,70% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/143743197
MD 46 39,13% 1 5,00% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/140416022
LB 44 56,82% 1 14,29% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/141301276
ZM 41 60,98% 0 0,00%
TM 39 33,33% 0 0,00%
TG 39 69,23% 0 0,00%
TJ 39 35,90% 0 0,00%
QA 38 21,05% 0 0,00%
CM 36 63,89% 0 0,00%
MN 35 14,29% 0 0,00%
ET 35 28,57% 0 0,00%
CD 35 62,86% 0 0,00%
BF 34 61,76% 0 0,00%
PS 34 79,41% 0 0,00%
HN 34 8,82% 0 0,00%
PA 34 5,88% 0 0,00%
OM 34 0,00% 0 0,00%
SV 33 36,36% 0 0,00%
MG 33 48,48% 0 0,00%
GY 33 15,15% 0 0,00%
BJ 33 45,45% #N/D #N/D #N/D
LS 32 75,00% 0 0,00%
ZW 30 40,00% 0 0,00%
JM 28 14,29% 0 0,00%
BI 27 51,85% 0 0,00%
GA 27 33,33% 0 0,00%
KN-K 25 16,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
KW 24 16,67% 0 0,00%
MW 23 30,43% 0 0,00%
KN 20 35,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
BH 20 5,00% 0 0,00%
MV 19 52,63% 0 0,00%
NA 19 36,84% 0 0,00%
CV 18 16,67% 0 0,00%
MU 17 11,76% 0 0,00%
ML 17 58,82% 0 0,00%
AD 17 5,88% 0 0,00%
MZ 16 56,25% 0 0,00%
VC 15 80,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
CG 14 64,29% 0 0,00%
LI 13 30,77% 1 7,69% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/138686945
NE 13 46,15% 1 11,11% https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/138147594
LY 12 83,33% 0 0,00%
AO 12 25,00% 0 0,00%
TD 11 81,82% 0 0,00%
PG 11 72,73% #N/D #N/D #N/D
BB 11 0,00% 0 0,00%
BZ 11 63,64% 0 0,00%
BT 11 9,09% 0 0,00%
FJ 10 50,00% 0 0,00%
SD 8 50,00% 0 0,00%
GM 8 50,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
SY 8 75,00% 0 0,00%
KP 8 100,00% 0 0,00%
GN 7 85,71% 0 0,00%
BN 6 0,00% 0 0,00%
SR 6 0,00% 0 0,00%
RW 6 33,33% 0 0,00%
VU 5 100,00% 0 0,00%
AF 5 80,00% 0 0,00%
DJ 4 75,00% 0 0,00%
DM 4 25,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
ER 4 25,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
TL 4 0,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
LR 4 50,00% 0 0,00%
GD 4 25,00% 0 0,00%
(vide) 3 0,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
YE 3 0,00% 0 0,00%
BW 3 0,00% 0 0,00%
SS 3 33,33% 0 0,00%
SL 3 33,33% 0 0,00%
SC 3 66,67% 0 0,00%
BS 2 50,00% 0 0,00%
SM 2 0,00% 0 0,00%
SB 2 0,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
PW 2 0,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
KI 2 100,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
KM 2 0,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
MR 2 50,00% 0 0,00%
MC 2 0,00% 0 0,00%
ST 1 100,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
SO 1 0,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D
AG 1 100,00% #N/D #N/D #N/D