User talk:Campbelltree

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In regards to an edit

Hi! In regards to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:golf&diff=next&oldid=3067251 could you explain more and maybe discuss it before in the e talk page before you change the proposal directly? HuggeK (talk) 06:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

oh oops, I definitely forgot that I was editing a proposal, yeah revert that and we can discuss Campbelltree (talk) 08:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Regarding updating leisure=pitch_area from "in use" to "proposed"

Hello!

Just seen you've updated this tag from "in use" to "proposed." I don't think this fits. The tag does not have a proposal associated with it and I have documented it as a tag currently in use by people mapping this feature.

The wiki is still fairly new to me though and I found the template docs lacking in what actually constitutes a proposal vs in use.

Many thanks for your time! CanopyFalls (talk) 16:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

I checked the template definition, and the wording there includes tags that don't have a formal proposal but are still experimental. I guess we could use the forum thread as the status link? Campbelltree (talk) 16:09, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
More importantly, I didn't think that "in use" was correct for something that we're actively planning on doing a mass rename for. Campbelltree (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
The Template:ValueDescription page says "proposed: the key or tag has been proposed to be used (but not yet approved) and usage of this tagging is minimal"
The Tag status page says "proposed: the key or tag has been formally proposed and discussed on the Tagging mailing list and at the proposal Talk page, but it has not yet reached the voting stage."
The "In Use" section on that same page pretty explicitly includes tags that are being used by a small number of mappers. I only documented the use after there were 26 uses.
I don't disagree that "in use" feels wrong but maybe in that case we need something like "informally proposed" or something similar or the wiki documentation on Tag Statuses needs updating. I can't find the documentation you've referenced. CanopyFalls (talk) 16:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
ah yes, I only referred to the Value Description template, sorry! Campbelltree (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
No worries, have reverted to in use status. CanopyFalls (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply