User talk:Campbelltree
Latest comment: 20 days ago by CanopyFalls in topic Regarding updating leisure=pitch_area from "in use" to "proposed"
In regards to an edit
Hi! In regards to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:golf&diff=next&oldid=3067251 could you explain more and maybe discuss it before in the e talk page before you change the proposal directly? HuggeK (talk) 06:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- oh oops, I definitely forgot that I was editing a proposal, yeah revert that and we can discuss Campbelltree (talk) 08:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Regarding updating leisure=pitch_area from "in use" to "proposed"
Hello!
Just seen you've updated this tag from "in use" to "proposed." I don't think this fits. The tag does not have a proposal associated with it and I have documented it as a tag currently in use by people mapping this feature.
The wiki is still fairly new to me though and I found the template docs lacking in what actually constitutes a proposal vs in use.
Many thanks for your time! CanopyFalls (talk) 16:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- I checked the template definition, and the wording there includes tags that don't have a formal proposal but are still experimental. I guess we could use the forum thread as the status link? Campbelltree (talk) 16:09, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- More importantly, I didn't think that "in use" was correct for something that we're actively planning on doing a mass rename for. Campbelltree (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- The Template:ValueDescription page says "proposed: the key or tag has been proposed to be used (but not yet approved) and usage of this tagging is minimal"
- The Tag status page says "proposed: the key or tag has been formally proposed and discussed on the Tagging mailing list and at the proposal Talk page, but it has not yet reached the voting stage."
- The "In Use" section on that same page pretty explicitly includes tags that are being used by a small number of mappers. I only documented the use after there were 26 uses.
- I don't disagree that "in use" feels wrong but maybe in that case we need something like "informally proposed" or something similar or the wiki documentation on Tag Statuses needs updating. I can't find the documentation you've referenced. CanopyFalls (talk) 16:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- ah yes, I only referred to the Value Description template, sorry! Campbelltree (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- No worries, have reverted to in use status. CanopyFalls (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- ah yes, I only referred to the Value Description template, sorry! Campbelltree (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)