Talk:Camino de Santiago

Relation: "Camino de Santiago"

ist this still useful? -- braegel 12:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

• I suggest to use the relation "Camino de Santiago" for creating a network of all variations of the Camino. I started my Camino at Düren, Germany and currently I am at Esneux, Belgium. This part of the Camino is called Via Mosana. Cheers -- braegel 15:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Via mossana or Via mosana ? See http://www.radiocamino.net/via-mosana ...

Wow, good question ... i'll think about that! -- braegel 19:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Jeay you are right! Thanks a lot.

I hope we will receive a lot of gpx. Have a good pilgrimage. Ultreia FrViPofm 21:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks for editing the Main Page. It looks great now. Cool tools! I already marked parts of my journey from Düren, Germany to Thimister-Clermont, Belgium as a relation called "Camino de Santiago". Is there a quick way to change this relation according to the example on the mainpage? --braegel 11:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

This intercept from Düren to Aachen ist not Part of the Via Mosana --braegel 12:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

35121 35121

The best tool for managging relations is JOSM, Is it a name for the part you have mapped ? FrViPofm 17:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes. If i understand you right. --braegel 19:37, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

• We have here in France a highway=path called "Camino de Santiago" here : http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/35223943. Could you add this somewhere in your tables ? -- Pieren 09:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Done, included in the Via Podiensis Via Podiensis FrViPofm 10:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

• Don't forget the Swiss and German (Projekt_Jakobsweg) routes. These already are partially mapped and have relations. SK53 10:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

For swiss ways, the Via francigena can be added to the Via Romea Francigena. For swiss part of the Camino, i've found no relation, can you be more explicit or can you include the relation in the table ? FrViPofm 10:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Relation hiking, relation biking

The map : http://sautter.com/map/?lon=-1.80382&lat=42.6765&zoom=14&layers=00B000TFFFFF is an example of conflict between hinking and biking. the highway=path has the tag name=Camino de Santiago and the highway=footway is included in the relation Camino franès. Obviously the footway is from a GPS track (made by bike) included without cnsideration for existing roads.

I think we need two relations for the Camino especialy on the Camino francès, one for hiking pilgrimage, one for people making the pilgrimage by bike. I suggest to tag them route=pilgrimage, foot and route=pilgrimage, foot, bicycle FrViPofm 10:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

change the relation-defintion ?

In germany i supported the Projekt Jakobsweg in hope to collect more relation-data. in germany even exists some special hiking maps [2],[3] but they did not show the relations of Jakobsweg.

I startet a posting in the german mailinglist and the openstreet-map-forum in hope to create a consens and the most reaction would like to use following tags for the Jakobsweg-Relations:

• route=hiking
• pilgrimage=yes

what is your opinion and would you like to retag the relations even ???

• [1] http://topo.geofabrik.de/
• [2] http://osm.lonvia.de/hiking.html?zoom=14&lat=47.34297&lon=8.6654&layers=TBT

regards Jan :-)

*route=hiking/bicycle + pilgrimage=yes FrViPofm 15:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

route=bicycle ... for the different declarations ??? --Jan Tappenbeck 10:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I have not understood the question... The EV3 is the pligrim road to Santiago by bicycle, The EV5 is the Via Romea Francigena by bike. And the Spanish part of the way to Santiago is very bad, mixing hiking and biking. I have introduced the different relations to distinguish the different ways of pilgrimage and I think they must be re-tagged using he proposed sheme : route=hiking for foot, route=bicycle for bicycle. FrViPofm 10:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)