Tag:historic=archaeological_site

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Help
Available languages
Deutsch English 日本語 Português do Brasil Русский
+/-Public-images-osm logo.svg historic=archaeological_site

One example for historic=archaeological_site

Description

a place in which evidence of past activity is preserved

Used on these elements

Can be attached on nodes Can not be attached on ways Can be attached on areas Unknown or not included in the template

Useful combination
Status

Undefined

Contents

Summary

"Archaeological site" is not restricted to excavations, but should also encompass all visible ancient monuments, most of which will not have been excavated. Naturally, excavated monuments that are widely known to tourists should also be tagged, but non-obvious unexcavated sites should not be tagged as to do so could encourage damage from treasure hunters.

Overview Map

An Overview Map of archaeological objects in OpenStreetMap has been created. (It appears to be limited to German boundaries.) The objects are evaluated according to the properties defined here (as of May 2006), and visualised with pictograms. Pictograms with yellow background indicate further information from the tags via pop-ups. Once JOSM is started with the remote control plugin, every object can be loaded directly into JOSM.

It is planned to update the maps once per week, or on request. --Lübeck / translated to English 12:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Mapping

An archeological site is mapped as a node or an area with historic=archaeological_site.

In addition, the following parameters should be given to describe the details of the object.

In many cases the Megaliths can be further differentiated, as in:
megalith_type=menhir - Menhir, aka Hinkelstein = large upright standing stone, see http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menhir (de) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menhir (en)
megalith_type=alignment - stone row (Ger. Steinreihe, Engl. alignment or stone row, Fr. alignement, see http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alignement_(Menhire)
megalith_type=stone_circle - stone circle (Ger. Steinkreis, Engl. stone circle, Fr. cromlech), see http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steinkreis
proposed icon
megalith_type=grosssteingrab - single-chamber megalithic tomb (Ger. Großsteingrab, internat. Dolmen), aka (Ger.) Hünengrab (not to be confused with a hill tomb aka (Ger.) Hügelgrab!): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Großsteingrab (de) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolmen (en)
megalith_type=passage_grave - passage grave (Ger. Ganggrab): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganggrab - also called (Ger.) Langbett = long bed.
megalith_type=chamber - only fragments of the grave are visible and the type can no longer be identified.
moved=yes - optional - there are graves that have been moved. [2]
When naming the megaliths, there is no avoiding the use the regional terms that have been coined in the different historical records and the varied history of the archaeological research. A unified English terminology is not possible, because for specific types of megaliths either no English word exists, or the established localised terminology is in use.
field=yes - Some graveyards consist of a number of tumuli. To avoid mapping all of them, the field tag can be used as an option.
Please note that at least some tumuli are also megalith structures and that there is a proposal for mapping them as tombs as well (see below).
fortification_type=hill_fort - mounds (incl. Ger. Burgwälle, Wallburgen, Ringwälle etc., En. hill fort, Fr. castro): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallburg (de) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill_fort (en)
fortification_type=limes - Roman Limes: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limes_(Grenzwall) (de) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limes (en)
fortification_type=sconce - Sconce, small protective fortification since the 19th century: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schanze_(Festungsbau) (de) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sconce_(fortification) (en)
fortification_type=ring_ditch - concentric circular ditches: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreisgrabenanlagen (de)

Rendering

Undecided

See also

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
site
Toolbox