Squares are often of interest for tourists and navigation to them is sought after. Examples:
- Red Square was "the official address of the Soviet government" --Jojo4u
- I disagree with the need for an addr: tag. Streets and places do not have addresses, they have names that become part of the address of adjacent objects. So the fifth house adjacent to Красная площадь gets the appropriate address, not the square itself. An address is something I can post a letter to, I cannot send one to a place. The soviet government did not sit on the Red Square, they sat in the Кремль, which is adjacent to the square, and uses the square in its address.
- As for navigation, the questions from tourists you cite demonstrate that they have the same misconception that an address is the only thing you can programme into your satnav. You can equally navigate to a named point of interest, or a place. Having the square in the place=* namespace provides the advantage, that routing engines most likely have the key already in the database, so navigating to place=square + name=Красная площадь is as easily implemented as navigating to place=city + name=Москва.
- I also disagree with the need for an addr:* tag by the same reason. Also, saying that USSR government had an address on the Red Square is completely incorrect (Wikipedia doesn't have reliable source reference for that statement) - first, "USSR Government" is a blanket term, which refers to several administrative offices, and all of them had own buildings (and addresses) somewhere else. --BushmanK (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Only one thing is disturbing me: the place=* tag is normally being used to indicate something administrative - I'd rather have preferred to use landuse=* tag instead which is for describing areas... --katpatuka (talk) 05:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- actually the tag place is used to describe something geographical, it's the tag boundary=administrative that is used for indicating administrative entities / their boundaries. Landuse on the other hand is an attribute and not suitable to define features (e.g. it can be arbitrarily split without changing meaning) --Dieterdreist (talk) 06:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)