Proposal:Relation:postal code
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
- Note that there is another boundary relation system with boundary=postal_codewhich is already in wide use.
 
- Note that there is another boundary relation system with 
| Relation:postal_code | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Obsoleted (inactive) | 
| Proposed by: | Robx | 
| Tagging: | type=postal_code | 
| Statistics: | 
 | 
| Draft started: | 2008-07-02 | 
This Relation could replace postal_code=* on ways. There should be one relation per postal code, grouping all streets with this postal code.
Tags
| Key | Value | Discussion | 
|---|---|---|
| type | postal_code | defines the type of the relation | 
| postal_code | * | the postal code | 
Members
| Way or Node | Role | Recurrence? | Discussion | 
|---|---|---|---|
|  | (blank) | zero or more | street with this postal code | 
Notes
- One might want to add other objects associated with the postal code to the relation, e.g., buildings. On the other hand, if they're already associated with a street in the relation, this isn't necessary.
- If a street consists of several ways, you can add a Relation:street to the postal code relation instead of the separate ways.