334
edits
Proposal:Healthcare 1.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Voting
(:::{{tag|amenity|language_school}} and {{tag|amenity|driving_school}} were supposed to get competing approved tagging scheme which is a stealthy deprecation attempt. ~~~~) |
(→Voting) |
||
|
{{vote|no}} If something must be deprecated, then I would rather deprecate {{tag|healthcare|hospital}} and stop ongoing mechanical edit by iD asking to add it to well tagged hospitals. Rationale is completely missing rationale why better established standard tag is supposed to be deprecated, rather than new one which is just pointlessly being double tagged. It is not the first attempt to deprecate this popular tags, and many people commented in the past about how they are not fans of this kind of deprecations of heavily used tags. Not sure why proposal author thought that this deprecation idea has widespread support. See [[Proposed features/training]] for latest case. --[[User:Mateusz Konieczny|Mateusz Konieczny]] ([[User talk:Mateusz Konieczny|talk]]) 22:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
::And fixing stuff like https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-December/063301.html would be a better first step. Or finish cleanup of tags deprecated with very good reasons. Or propose to deprecate tags which are NOT among the most heavily used ones. Or propose to deprecate {{tag|highway|unclassified}} that is actually problematic and causing endless confusion and there would be some benefit from such disruption. [[User:Mateusz Konieczny|Mateusz Konieczny]] ([[User talk:Mateusz Konieczny|talk]]) 22:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
::
{{vote|no}} This proposal will replace well established tags such as {{Tag|amenity|dentist}} with {{Tag|healthcare|dentist}} with no gain. --[[User:Fabi2|Fabi2]] ([[User talk:Fabi2|talk]]) 22:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
{{Vote|no}} Too many unresolved issues, so I don't see a clear advantage of the proposed change. The overall quality of the data would decline. Just "tidiness" is not a sufficient aim in my opinion. There is no explanation what is actually meant by "further development" and why it is necessary to have uniformity before. (And I assume one won't get uniformity by this proposal). --[[User:Segubi|Segubi]] ([[User talk:Segubi|talk]]) 23:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
| |||