7,599
edits
(→Voting) |
Dieterdreist (talk | contribs) (→Voting) |
||
{{Vote|no}} Too many unresolved issues, so I don't see a clear advantage of the proposed change. The overall quality of the data would decline. Just "tidiness" is not a sufficient aim in my opinion. There is no explanation what is actually meant by "further development" and why it is necessary to have uniformity before. (And I assume one won't get uniformity by this proposal). --[[User:Segubi|Segubi]] ([[User talk:Segubi|talk]]) 23:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
{{vote|yes}} --[[User:Mashin|Mashin]] ([[User talk:Mashin|talk]]) 23:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
{{vote|no}} I am worried how much support there is for completely unrealistic ideas like deprecating established and widely used, globally important features like {{tag|amenity|hospital}}. Apparently you are not aware how expensive this would be, how insignificant the benefit of tagging with one or the other tag (with less probability of risking the exclusion under amenity) compared to requiring from all apps to act or have hospitals disappearing. —[[User:Dieterdreist|Dieterdreist]] ([[User talk:Dieterdreist|talk]]) 00:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
|
edits