Talk:Tag:surface=dirt

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Latest comment: 14 days ago by Julcnx in topic Graded but not rolled: where does this fit?
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Does "not gravel" mean no gravel particles, or gravel not dominant?

The definition says the surface is "not sand, gravel or rock," but native soils frequently contain gravel-sized particles alongside silt and clay. A gravelly clay or sandy loam can look and behave like a dirt road while technically containing a gravel fraction. If the intent is that gravel is not the dominant character of the surface, the definition should say so explicitly — consistent with the dominant-character principle discussed on Talk:Tag:surface=gravel and Talk:Tag:surface=compacted. julcnx (talk) 06:56, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Graded but not rolled: where does this fit?

A common practice in rural Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia is to grade local or imported soil/gravel mix with a motor grader — producing a cambered, drained surface — but without a follow-up roller pass. The result looks stable in dry conditions but behaves like surface=dirt after rain. By the current definitions this surface is neither surface=dirt (it has been shaped and may use imported material) nor surface=compacted (it was not mechanically rolled): should one of the two definitions explicitly address this case, or should surface=compacted be relaxed to cover grading without rolling? Related thread: Talk:Tag:surface=compacted#Should the definition require imported aggregate? julcnx (talk) 06:56, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply