User talk:Gummibaerli

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

hey gummibärli, je ne suis pas un vrai romand mais j'ai habité à lausanne pendant 8ans.. j'habite a berne dès que j'ai demenagé (weekend et lundi).. je suis dans le quartier bethlehem (bern est). envie d'aller boire un verre un de ces jours chaud? andreas ( --blk 22:11, 13 July 2007 (BST) )

Hey Gummibärli, Ich habe gesehen, dass du auf der Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Key:highway#International_equivalence den Text für die Schweiz auf Französisch eingefügt hast. Als highway=tertiary hast du "route de 3eme classe" angegeben. was für Strassen sind dies? Ich kenne in der Schweiz nur Haupt- und Nebenstrassen sowie unklassifizierte (solche ohne Markierung in der Mitte). Raphael Studerap 07:14, 16 August 2007 (BST)

Die Unterschied zwischen 3. Klasse ("tertiary") und unklassifierte Strasse ("unclassified") wäre dass die ersten sind noch durch Lastwagen befahrbar. Dieses Dokument von Swisstopo [1] ist noch hilfreich. Es muss noch genauer in den verschiedene juristische Texte beschrieben... --Gummibaerli 11:21, 16 August 2007 (BST)

Open Rail Map (tagspew)

Thanks

Have amended accordingly, take a look..:)

ShakespeareFan00 00:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Current Coverage

Hey the Ch:current_coverage page is quite cool! Could you re-generate actual stats or teach me how to do that? greetz, --blk 07:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Keine Hexerei, einfach ein schweizer-Extrakt aus geofabrik.de herunterladen und mit osm2pgsql in die PostgreSQL/PostGIS Datenbank hochladen. Dann mit PostGIS spielen... OK, ich werden trotzdem die Statistiken nachführen. --Gummibaerli 17:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:Bern-2007-12-10.png ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified January 2022}} from the file page.

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)