Talk:Tag:route=fitness trail
Contents |
Relation tags
length or distance
What's better? length or distance? --t-i 23:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Discussion:
- I'd prefer distance. It's more common for route relations (see osmdoc [1] vs. [2]). It's already used for Relation:route, too. --Werner2101 07:12, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Convinced. I changed it. --t-i 11:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Members and Roles
On the main page there's no definition for the roles and members. The following table can be used for further discussions.
| Object type | Role | Description |
|---|---|---|
|
None/forward/backward | any kind of ways along the fitness trail route. Can be tagged with forward/backward to indicate the direction of the route (respective to the direction of the tagged way) |
 
|
station | exercise stations |
|
|
start, stop | markings for the start and endpoint of the fitness trail |
Role for the exercise stations
Different possibilities are:
- simple role name station
- role with number e.g. stop_*, station_*
Discussion:
- I think the number should not be part of the role. It should be added as ref= tag to the station. I'm prefering the role station, because stop can also be a role for the endpoint of the route relation. --Werner2101 07:12, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
how should it be tagged, if the start-node is also the end-node of the trail. how do i handle ways in the relation that are used more then once (in both directions)? --Flaimo 23:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Member tagging
tagging the exercises
| Key | Value | Discussion |
|---|---|---|
| leisure | fitness_station | |
| sport | exercise | a sport tag (might also be an leisure tag) |
| name | a name | a name for the exercise station. e.g. jumping, sit-up, ... |
| description | * (optional) | longer description for the exercise |
| ref | * (optional) | a ref number of the exercise station |
possible tags for sport:
- sport=exercise
- sport=gymnastics
- sport=...
--t-i 23:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think there's currently no sport tag that fits for fitness trail exercises. I think we should create a new tag. I think good tags are sport=exercise or sport=fitness_trail_station. --Werner2101 07:57, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- On the sport=*-page it says, that sport should never be used without a physical key like leisure or amenity, so probabebly something like leisure=exercise_post would be needed. I'll take it to the international tagging-mailinglist to see if any native can come up with some good idea. --t-i 14:06, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have made photos of all the exercise stations and related sign pots of a near by fittness trail. Perhaps we could build a table, where each kind of exercise is listed and how to tag them.
- --De muur 17:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Different kind of fitness trails
These fitness trails are very common in Belgium and you find them in most parks and some woods (they're called "fit-o-meter"). But I've seen special ones in some places, like a 50+ fit-o-meter (for elder people only). So how would one tag variations like this? --Eimai 10:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Is it forbidden for youngers to run there? ;) You could use an additional fitness_trail:type=50+ if you want to differntiate. Can you think of other types? I think here in Switzerland the differentiation is made by different exercises on the same post (e.g. 20cm, 35cm and 50cm high blocks to step up). --t-i 11:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Running trails
Also, I think running routes shouldn't be on this page. It's something completely different and deserves its own tagging. --Eimai 10:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- That line is just to make clear, what a fitness_trail is not. Somewhen, I will set up a distinctive page about route=running.. --t-i 11:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Something similar, yet different.
If you look at the photo above, you see that it's not a conventional fitness route, but a bunch of conventional fitness stuff (as you find in a fitness centre, but in more robust materials) in a public park. So it's not a fitness centre (it has no opening hours, no building, no name ...) and it's also not a fitness trail (as all things are on the same spot).
Currently I tagged the location with a fixme note: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1736717710
I hope some people here can propose a tag that would also work for this case. --Sanderd17 23:01, 30 April 2012 (BST)
