Proposal talk:Transformer extension proposal
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Fanfouer in topic Rationale
Decent proposal, but currently quite specialized towards French infrastructure. I have some safety concerns about the advisability of hanging around HT equipment and the elevated likelihood of arrest when taking unauthorized notes around critical infrastructure, though. --Scruss (talk) 20:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, this is a very good comment. I've completed the proposal and particularly the Where do I find such data? chapter.
- All examples pictures had been took outside of HT facilities or during picture-allowed public visits.
- Indicative plates zooming had been got from the outside with optics or allowed by grid operators staff.
- Examples are mainly French indeed, but is there any proposal point which isn't properly world scaled? Fanfouer (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Rationale
What’s currently in the rationale section isn’t really a rationale for the proposal, it’s just a definition of terms. What’s the value of adding these tags to OSM? --Gurglypipe (talk) 08:48, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- That's right. I've add additional details about this. The main benefits are : provide a better tagging model to guide consumers if they wish to describe power transformers and improve data quality and completeness about power networks designs. Fanfouer (talk) 18:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)