From OpenStreetMap Wiki
(Redirected from Proposed features/autodrome)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposal status: Rejected (inactive)
Proposed by: Sergey93
Tagging: landuse=autodrome
Applies to: тип - node, area, relation
Definition: Place for driving transport

Rendered as: picture
Draft started: 2018-03-07
RFC start: 2018-03-08
Vote start: 2018-03-28
Vote end: 2018-04-11

Autodrome - closed place for driving a vehicle (auto, moto, tractor, truck, bus etc.). It's area, not way


Adding type

Key Value Comment
autodrome:type driving_school / training_area includes test drive for customers
tests_area no military


Aerial view of Pocono Raceway.JPG

For racing

Driving school

US Navy 111115-N-YM863-010 Traffic safety instructor from Cape Fox Professional Services, demonstrates driving the course.jpg
Driving School in Tokyo (8982091)..jpg

A small area designed for inexperienced drivers and does not contain dangerous objects

Tests area

Hirono drive school in1974.JPG
Truck testing
' 12 - ITALY - Fiat Panda 4x4 Off-road test drive - Motorshow di Bologna cut.JPG

An area with complex structures for testing the strength of the car or the ability of the driver. May have ditches, culverts, bridges, climbs, fords, hills to test the suspension


Voting closed

Voting on this proposal has been closed.

It was rejected with 7 votes against.

The proposal did not reach the quota of at least ten votes with more than 74% approval.

  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. Personally I agree with much of what Verdy said: this problem occurs especially when it comes to a circuit for driving school. Consequently, to include what is proposed on this page, I think we have to review everything related to race tracks for motor sports... --EneaSuper (talk) 18:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. Good value, unsuitable key. should be leisure= or amenity=. --Polarbear w (talk) 20:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. 'type' is not a usefull descriptor, 'purpose' or 'use' may be better. Landuse and lesiure are not good keys ... Needs more thought. Warin61 (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. however this is not really for "leisure" (or rarely). More likely will be a driving school (for cars, motorbikes, buses, trucks...). If this is for practicing a sport (e.g. motocross, or racing), then this should be a sport pitch (and there should be a welldefined track in it). In all cases this is an "amenity", even if most often it will be private (just like many schools and sport facilities). the proposed tag "autodrome" seems to restriuct the use only for cars/"auto", but most of these facilities are for various kinds of motorized vehicles (and frequently changing depending on scheduled hours/days). If this is for testing vehicles (as part of a certification process, this is generally a dependency of a vehicle factory, and will frequently be done on generic parking/storage areas, or part of the private facilities a racing club and this use will not be permanent, only when some new vehicles need testing; most tests however occur within factories and only concern engines, without driving a vehicle; evaluations for pollution are also made statically on test banks, real life evaluation/measurements should occur on public networks in real conditions, with measurement instruments on board beside the driver). — Verdy_p (talk) 23:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. against landuse key, as mentioned during RFC - Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 15:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. This should be in the leisure tag like other facilities used mainly for sports. Please have a look to this proposal I made: Subtags should be of type yes/no to allow more than one to be used, maybe with a common prefix usable also with leisure=sports_centre, leisure=stadium. Eg. PREFIX:racing=yes/no, PREFIX:training=yes/no sorcrosc (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal. I agree with what was already stated: landuse is not a suitable tag because this is about a feature, landuse is not for features. There is already leisure=racetrack combined with sport, and AFAIR there is also a tag for the educational vehicle training area, at least it was discussed.—Dieterdreist (talk) 20:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)