Talk:Key:website:map
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Shouldn't this be Key:url:map?
- This doesn't seem to be a link to a website about the feature, according to the example, but a URL linking to a copy of the feature on an online map. Shouldn't this be Key:url:map?
Is this tag really necessary?
- In the example provided, the url is just "https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=9067481" - but the id of the route relation lined is also 9067481 and this is already stored in the database as "id=9067481" - so applications can just use the id to link to the the right URL with a feature like "view this route in waymarkedtrails.org". This method also has the benefit with working for any number of maps, not just one. --Jeisenbe (talk) 04:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, you misunderstood the example. The example have: website http://bruksleden.se/etapper/etapp-10 website:map http://bruksleden.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Bruksledenkarta4_20140616.pdf. The reason I ended up with website:map is because it is linked from the website. Now that I thought about it some more I have come to find that source= or source:map= might be better.--PangoSE (talk) 11:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)