User talk:Dooley

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Latest comment: 8 days ago by Dooley in topic Lgbtq=* Revision Vote
Jump to navigation Jump to search

OSMSuspects!

Hi Dooley, packe das einfach alles auf OSMsuspects! - dafür sind unsere WikiSeiten doch da! :-) Viele Grüße --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Danke für den Hinweis, ist soeben erfolgt.
Gern. Ich habe ein paar Kleinigkeiten geändert, hoffe, es passt dir so. --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 17:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ja, passt. Danke dir.

Lgbtq=* Revision Vote

Hi Dooley, you didn't specify a reason for your oppose vote on the Lgbtq=* Revision proposal. This is a requirement as per the Proposal process. Could you please add a reason to your vote? Thanks in advance. Spughetti (talk) 07:00, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oppose, they should give a reason for their proposal.
should != must. So i can or cannot give a reason. It's my choice. Dooley (talk) 12:05, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I've made a topic on the forum so the community can weigh in: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/contributor-refuses-to-provide-a-reason-for-oppose-vote-what-to-do/147672 Spughetti (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Nice. Is that the spirit in OSM now?
[quote="spughetti, post:13, topic:147672"]
refusing to state the reason for an oppose vote on an **LGBTQ** proposal of all things suggests bad faith in all the worst ways
[/quote] Dooley (talk) 09:48, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
So far you have:
  • Voted oppose on an LGBTQ proposal without specifying a reason
  • Refused to provide one when asked
  • Reacted with a 🍿 emoji on the forum instead of participating in the conversation
None of these things signal that you're acting out of good faith or have a constructive opinion on the proposal. Spughetti (talk) 10:32, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
What do you expect when you mention me personally in a forum and practically attack me? It is and remains my own business whether I give a reason or not. Would you feel better if, for example, I had stated "There are only two" as the reason?
It is outrageous of you to impute bad intentions to me—and to do so publicly.
And with that, the discussion is over for me. I have no desire to argue about pointless things. Dooley (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply