User talk:Kylenz

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Kylenz in topic Your edit
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Building=demountable

Resolved

I believe this is an interesting property, but it is not the building type. A demountable classroom is a classroom and it is demountable=yes or building:prefabricated=* (already in significant use), and I ask you to revert your recent edit to the building page and move the content to building:prefabricated or propose “demountable” —Dieterdreist (talk) 08:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Dieterdreist:, I don't really care how they're tagged (as long as we have some way of mapping it). I just saw a link to building=demountable on this page: Tag:building=container, so I just documented the current use of tag. Please feel free to edit or change any of that. It's great that building:prefabricated=* already exists - but look at Special:WhatLinksHere/Key:building:prefabricated: building:prefabricated=* is only mentioned on 2 international wiki pages, none of which are related to buildings... so I think the documentation needs to be majorly improved, otherwise no one will figure out that building:prefabricated=* exists, and that it is a better option than building=demountable or building=prefabricated --Kylenz (talk) 08:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have added now references from building:container --Dieterdreist (talk) 12:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! --Kylenz (talk) 23:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Benchmark-Projecting-Bracket.jpg

Resolved

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Are you author of image https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Benchmark-Projecting-Bracket.jpg ?

[...]

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 10:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, appologies for the delayed reply, I belive i've removed or fixed all of these cases now. Thanks for bringing them to my attention. --Kylenz 10:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Missing file information

Resolved

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:Benchmark-Projecting-Bracket.jpg ?

[...]

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

duplicate of conversation above --Kylenz 10:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Missing file information

Resolved

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:Forklift-caution.png ?

[...]

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I replied below by mistake, but for future reference, this was resolved. --Kylenz 10:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Photo author

Resolved

Have you taken https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Socket_as3123_4pin.jpg photo? Or is it an image found somewhere on the internet? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 23:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, that photo is from the internet, but you can delete it because I found File:New_Zealand_road_sign_W18-6.svg —Preceding unsigned comment added by kylenz (talk • contribs) 12:30, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Missing file information

Resolved

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:NZ missing streets.png ?

[...]

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 22:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hi, it's a screenshot of OSM carto with some lines drawn on top and a popup. There is no option in the license dropdown that works in this situation.

What is the license of icons used there? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I didn't realize that would be a problem. They're just emojis, using the default emoji font on windows. I'll take a new screenshot with text buttons instead of emoji buttons. sorry... --Kylenz 06:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I admit that I am not entirely sure it is a problem, but it is tricky topic with some really confusing court decisions. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Threshold_of_originality for partial overview of small part of the issues Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Okay, to be safe I'll replace it with something this weekend --Kylenz 10:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Missing file information

Resolved

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Led wall on building.jpg ?

[...]

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Missing file information

Resolved

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Siphon diagram.jpg ?

[...]

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Missing file information

Resolved

File:Trig-Station.jpg - the same as above. Something B (talk) 08:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm pretty sure this one's my photo, since there's no results from a google reverse-image search. But I've removed it from the 14 pages just to be safe. There's an endless number of similar photos in Category:Trig points in New_Zealand --Kylenz 10:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rep

Unresolved

+rep Emilius123 (talk) 10:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean --Kylenz 10:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Antarctic

Resolved

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File%3AAntarctic-borehole.jpg

Do you remember author and source of this file? Have you maybe taken this photo? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, no I can't recall what the source or license is, you can delete it if you want --Kylenz 10:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Waikarei - authorship

Resolved

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Wairakei_geothermal_field.jpg - do you know who is author of this one? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I took this photo, you change it to CC0 or CC4-self --Kylenz 01:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your edit

Just curious why you'd think [1] so? 99 tabazan (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Property:P8 is for linking to external data sources, not for linking to internal sites like the wiki and taginfo.
That kind of linking is done automatically in places like the osm-website - every tag with a wiki page automatically becomes a hyperlink, no need to manually add Property:P8 —Kylenz 14:41, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Actually, that isn't automatic, it only works if (and after) the list of tags is updated. Also, that is of limited usefulness when tags routinely include multiple values. This is adequately handled by the formatter. There doesn't seem to be the limitation you mention. --99 tabazan (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Those are issues that you should raise on openstreetmap/opensteetmap-website GitHub, both of with are trivial to implement if they accept the idea. (automatically running the perl script every X weeks (and ideally speeding up that script!?); and linkifying semicolon-delimited tags like node cuisine=burger;chicken). Fixing the root cause of an issue is always better than workarounds like this --Kylenz 09:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
A valid example of Property:P8 for traffic_sign=* would be https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/?signs=$1
However, there seems to be a bug with that website causing links to only work for some countries. You could also raise an issue for that at osmberlin/osm-traffic-sign-tool GitHub --Kylenz 09:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
If it only works for some countries, it might not be a good example. Links should give a reasonable result for most if not all tags. It doesn't really matter where it's hosted. Did you encounter some issue with the link that should be addressed? Your alternative solutions seem to place quite a burden on various developers. --99 tabazan (talk) 21:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I don’t think ‘burden’ is a good description, I’m happy to implement these improvements if the ideas are accepted. When we added support for tag2link last year, the idea wasn’t to misuse that feature as a workaround for limitations with the existing linkification of wiki pages.
The next step would be to open a GitHub issue to see if the maintainers support the idea. Is this something you want to do, or should I? —10:19, 25 September 2026 (UTC) Kylenz 10:19, 25 September 2026 (UTC)Reply