User talk:Lodda

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hallo Lodda,

Du hast auf einer Seite die Frage aufgeworfen, wann eine Karte vollständig ist.

Ich hätte da noch Symbole anzubieten für

  • Rollstuhlfahrer-Vollständigkeit (Treppen, Aufzüge, Rampen, Schwimmhallen mit Lift ins Wasser, abgesenkte Bordsteine, Benutzbarkeit der Öffis, Behinderten-Toiletten und welchen Schlüssel man dazu braucht.)
  • Blinden-Vollständigkeit (Taktile Karten, abgesenkte Bordsteine, Bushaltestellen mit taktilem Pflaster, akustische Ampeln, Gefahrenstellen, Restaurants mit Karten in Brailleschrift...)
  • Vollständigkeit für Hörbehinderte (Theater mit Unter- und Übertiteln, Kinos mit Untertiteln, Theater mit extra-Verstärkern, die man direkt ans Hörgerät anschließen kann)

Ich hoffe, mit diesen Wünschen ist Deine Langeweile eine Zeit lang vertrieben. :-)

Ich arbeite derweil an Karten, diese Dinge auch darzustellen.

Schöne Grüße Lulu-Ann

Statusanzeige für Reitwege und Wanderrouten

Hat schon mal jemand ein Symbol für den Status der Erfassung von Reitwegen und Wanderrouten gesehen? Viele Grüße Elmada


Hallo Lodda,
An anderer Stelle hast Du nach Hilfen für das Erstellen von Routen-Relationen gesucht. Vielleicht helfen Dir diese Beispiele weiter: Hilfen für das Erfassen von Routen Viele Grüße Elmada

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Historisch- literarische Wanderwege.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Lodda}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.


Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)