User talk:Rotbarsch

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Kaufberatung

Hallo Rotbarsch, ich bin jetzt angefixt. Ein paar Gerätebeschreibungen habe ich mir angesehen. Kannst Du mir vielleicht sagen, was für Eigenschaften der Legend HCx im Vergleich zu Deinem Gerät hat? Man scheint ihn auch gut zum Wandern benutzen zu können. Ipofanes 07:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)==

Hallo Ipofanes!
Schön, dass Du Dir ein Gerät anschaffen möchtest. Rückblickend muss ich sagen, dass es nicht das 60Csx sein musste und dass meiner Meinung nach das von Dir anvisierte Legend HCx auch ausreicht. Alle wichtigen Funktionen hast Du damit abgedeckt. Das Display ist etwas kleiner was sicherlich der spürbarste Unterschied ist, Kompass und barometrischer Höhenmesser fehlen. Das 60er Gehäuse erscheint etwas stabiler. Den Kompass habe ich noch nicht gebraucht (einmal 10m in eine Richtung laufen und Du weißt die Himmmelsrichtungen), zumal er eingeschaltet auch extra Strom frisst. Der Höhenmesser ist in den Bergen sicher eine feine Sache, aber die ungenauere GPS-Höhe hast Du ja auch bei Deinem Gerät. Für das Legend sprechen Gewicht und Akkulaufzeit. Ein gutes Händchen beim Kauf wünscht --Rotbarsch 08:42, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

neutrale Status-Icons

Hi,

es gibt jetzt neutrale Status-Icons: File:State 0.png File:State 1.png File:State 2.png File:State 3.png File:State 4.png, Image:State_.png ist weiß.

--Grungelborz 19:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! --Rotbarsch 07:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Es gibt dieselben nun auch als svg: State .svg State 0.svg State 1.svg State 2.svg State 3.svg State 4.svg State X.svg --glglgl 19:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Rotbarsch !

Für dich zur Info, diese Zeilen habe ich an die User (Mail bzw. Diskussionsseite) geschrieben, die in "Essen" eingetragen sind.

"Schau doch mal bitte hier [1] nach und trage dich für ein geplantes Treffen in Essen ein (wenn du Zeit hast). Trage dich bitte auch ein, wenn du generell Interesse hast, aber an dem Termin nicht kannst. Bei Nachfragen schicke mir einfach eine Mail."

mfg, --Pitje 20:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Tagung in Essen

Hi, hast Du für mich bei Dir noch eine Matratze frei? Würde mich freuen! Gruss, --Markus 12:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

OSM Workshop

Hallo du hattest dich zum Workshop in Essen vorangemeldet. Bitte melde dich jetzt unter: OSM Kickoff Treffen verbindlich an. Gruß Sven Anders 17:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Clean-up: Probleme mit Links

Hallo Rotbarsch, die Links unter User:Rotbarsch/Spielwiese#Test_OSM_query tun nicht mehr bzw. die "edit-Links" führen zu einer Seite, von der aus es nicht weiter geht.

Gruß --Rennhenn 12:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Treffen PB 20090526 2.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Rotbarsch}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Treffen PB 20090526 3.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Rotbarsch}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 12:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)