User talk:Valor Naram

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

My talk page. This page can be used to contact me publicly. All the conversation on this site can be seen by others

Changes on Wikipage object

Hi, I just removed the changes you made on the wikipage about addresses on objects that I created. Your edit contained many orthographic mistakes and bag language style. I disagree with the point that an address is only useful for bringing letters and packages. An address can also be used by taxi drivers to fetch passengers, by movie enthusiast to locate a movie theater or by customers to find a shop. In the text that I started I don't want to get the idiom "address" to be reduced to something only useful for delivery of letters and packages. --BlackBike (talk) 18:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

diaper deprecation

Hi, while I am happy you have won the proposal and diaper will likely go away, I believe the description (feature template) should not be removed. At the moment the tag is still in use, and even when it goes completely away, it could be useful to keep the documentation (e.g. to understand older data extracts).—Dieterdreist (talk) 16:13, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Don't worry, I will keep the documentation for diaper=* for historical reasons. It's just set to deprecated--Valor Naram (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
I am not sure if I understand the history correctly, there seems to be some problem with the wiki? [1] I see a lot of deletions? —Dieterdreist (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
It was the template I used to flag it as deprecated. It has changed the status to deprecated --Valor Naram (talk) 20:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
yes, the status change is ok for me, but there’s no need to remove the definition and other template items: {{KeyDescription



|key=diaper − |description=Changing nappies/diapers or separate rooms that include a nappy/diaper changer.

− |image=File:Changing table.jpg

− |group=Properties

− |onNode=yes

− |onWay=no

− |onArea=yes

− |onRelation=no

− |statuslink=

− |wikidata=Q1780834

Did not deleted it, see I don't know why MediaWiki shows that I deleted something. --Valor Naram (talk) 10:01, 13 June 2019 (UTC)


Hello! And sorry for bothering you, but descriptions of files you uploaded need to be improved.

You have uploaded files which are licensed as requiring attribution. But right now attribution is not specified properly.

Please, ask for help if something is confusing or unclear in this message.

Please, fix that problem with this uploads - note that images with unclear licensing situation may be deleted.

Attribution may be missing completely or just be specified in nonstandard way, in either case it needs to be improved. Note that using CC-BY files without specifying attribution is a copyright violation, which is often unethical and unwanted. So clearly specifying required attribution is needed if license which makes attribution mandatory was used.

If it is applying to your own work which not based on work by others - then you can select own user name or some other preferred attribution or even change license to for example {{CC0-self}}

For your own work: ensure that it is clearly stated at file page that you created image/took the photo/etc

For works by others - please ensure that there is link to the original source which confirms license and that you used proper attribution, or that source is clearly stated in some other way.

Especially for old OSM-baded maps, made from data before license change on 12 September 2012 you should use "map data © OpenStreetMap contributors" as at least part of attribution

For old OSM Carto maps, which predate license change on 12 September 2012 you can use a special template {{OSM Carto screenshot||old_license}}