Proposed features/Dry riser inlet

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Löschwassereinspeisung Hackesche Höfe Berlin.jpg
Dry riser inlet
Status: Voting (under way)
Proposed by: dieterdreist
Tagging: emergency=dry_riser_inlet
Applies to: node Node
Definition: a point to which firefighters can connect a pressurized water source
Drafted on: 2017-03-09
RFC start: 2017-11-16
Vote start: 2017-12-01
Vote end: 2017-12-31 (extended)

Proposal

The dry riser inlet or fire department connection (FDC) is a point to which firefighters can connect a pressurized water source. It's the endpoint of a dry riser, an empty tube to distribute water to various parts of a building or structure in case of a fire.

Rationale

There is a tag for the other endpoint, emergency=fire_hydrant in combination with fire_hydrant:type=wall but apparently none for the inlet.

Tagging

Add emergency=dry_riser_inlet for a dry riser inlet. Other useful tags include

For more details on possibly useful tags, see Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions_(part_2)

External Discussions

Comments

Please comment on the discussion page.


Voting

Instructions for voting
  • Log in to the wiki if you are not already logged in.
  • Scroll down to voting and click 'Edit source'. Copy and paste the appropriate code from this table on its own line at the bottom of the text area:
I approve this proposal yes {{vote|yes}} --~~~~
I oppose this proposal no {{vote|no}} reason --~~~~
Replace reason with your reason(s) for voting no.
I abstain from voting but have comments abstain {{vote|abstain}} comments --~~~~
If you want don't want to vote but have comments. Replace comments with your comments.

Note: The ~~~~ automatically inserts your name and the current date.


  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --EneaSuper (talk) 10:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- Cascafico (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Bubix (talk) 08:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Would be great to see on which geometry it applies to (I assume the new key is only valid on nodes) Fanfouer (talk) 11:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
I would also assume nodes only, but in the end tags have to be applied to the objects they belong to, and this depends on the situation and is the competence of the mapper. —Dieterdreist (talk) 09:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Marc CH (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Sirmmo (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)--
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Lorenzo_perone (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --GeoFrizz (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Pignolog (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Viking81 (talk) 22:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Robkoch (talk) 20:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. —Dieterdreist (talk) 09:01, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --MoritzM (talk) 11:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Michi (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I oppose this proposal I oppose this proposal.--Gosausee Unnötig, weil zu ungenau. Welche Feuerwehr würde diese Daten verwenden? Das hat nichts mehr mit Landkarten zu tun.
Interesting argument, who would use that. I have heart that about OSM in general. In 2004.
+1, das hat wirklich nichts mehr mit Landkarten zu tun. —Dieterdreist (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Polarbear w (talk) 20:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Emergency99 (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. already tagged some ;) --Dakon (talk) 22:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Roman H (talk) 23:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --User 5359 (talk) 09:17, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --GuntherH (talk) 13:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Mueschel (talk) 14:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Uboot (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Luschi (talk) 17:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)