Proposal:Dry riser inlet

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Löschwassereinspeisung Hackesche Höfe Berlin.jpg
Dry riser inlet
Proposal status: Approved (active)
Proposed by: dieterdreist
Tagging: emergency=dry_riser_inlet
Applies to: node node
Definition: a point to which firefighters can connect a pressurized water source
Statistics:

Draft started: 2017-03-09
RFC start: 2017-11-16
Vote start: 2017-12-01
Vote end: 2017-12-31 (extended)

Proposal

The dry riser inlet or fire department connection (FDC) is a point to which firefighters can connect a pressurized water source. It's the endpoint of a dry riser, an empty tube to distribute water to various parts of a building or structure in case of a fire.

Rationale

There is a tag for the other endpoint, emergency=fire_hydrant in combination with fire_hydrant:type=wall but apparently none for the inlet.

Tagging

Add emergency=dry_riser_inlet for a dry riser inlet. Other useful tags include

For more details on possibly useful tags, see Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions_(part_2)

External Discussions

Comments

Please comment on the discussion page.


Voting

Instructions for voting
  • Log in to the wiki if you are not already logged in.
  • Scroll back down and click "Edit source" next to the title "Voting". Copy and paste the appropriate code from this table on its own line at the bottom of the text area:
To get this output you type Description
{{vote|yes}} --~~~~ Feel free to also explain why you support the proposal!
{{vote|no}} reason --~~~~ Replace reason with your reason(s) for voting no.
{{vote|abstain}} comments --~~~~ If you don't want to vote yes or no but do have something to say. Replace comments with your comments.
Note: The ~~~~ automatically inserts your name and the current date.
For more types of votes you can cast, see Template:Vote. See also how vote outcome is processed.


I would also assume nodes only, but in the end tags have to be applied to the objects they belong to, and this depends on the situation and is the competence of the mapper. —Dieterdreist (talk) 09:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Interesting argument, who would use that. I have heart that about OSM in general. In 2004.
+1, das hat wirklich nichts mehr mit Landkarten zu tun. —Dieterdreist (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

22 YES, 1 NO, feature is approved