From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Available languages — Tracksource
Afrikaans Alemannisch aragonés asturianu azərbaycanca Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Melayu Bân-lâm-gú Basa Jawa Baso Minangkabau bosanski brezhoneg català čeština dansk Deutsch eesti English español Esperanto estremeñu euskara français Frysk Gaeilge Gàidhlig galego Hausa hrvatski Igbo interlingua Interlingue isiXhosa isiZulu íslenska italiano Kiswahili Kreyòl ayisyen kréyòl gwadloupéyen kurdî latviešu Lëtzebuergesch lietuvių magyar Malagasy Malti Nederlands Nedersaksies norsk norsk nynorsk occitan Oromoo oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Plattdüütsch polski português română shqip slovenčina slovenščina Soomaaliga suomi svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Vahcuengh vèneto Wolof Yorùbá Zazaki српски / srpski беларуская български қазақша македонски монгол русский тоҷикӣ українська Ελληνικά Հայերեն ქართული नेपाली मराठी हिन्दी অসমীয়া বাংলা ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ગુજરાતી ଓଡ଼ିଆ தமிழ் తెలుగు ಕನ್ನಡ മലയാളം සිංහල ไทย မြန်မာဘာသာ ລາວ ភាសាខ្មែរ ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ አማርኛ 한국어 日本語 中文(简体)‎ 吴语 粵語 中文(繁體)‎ ייִדיש עברית اردو العربية پښتو سنڌي فارسی ދިވެހިބަސް

Tracksource ( is a project gathering and releasing geodata for Brazil.

Incompatible license

While Tracksource makes data available for download, it is only available under the CC BY-NC-ND license (see the bottom of Tracksource about page) This license does not allow commercial use and prevents derivative works. Sadly this means you are not allowed to take tracksource data and put it into OpenStreetMap. This is because OpenStreetMap is re-distributing data under the OpenDatabaseLicense (ODbL) which allows commercial use. While OpenStreetMap itself is not a commercial profit making venture, we do redistribute to many commercial companies, and we do allow derivative adaptations.

Why is OpenStreetMap so strict?

OpenStreetMap must be strict in not accepting data which has a non-commercial requirement attached. But first of all, who is OpenStreetMap? Although ultimately the Data Working Group may take action to remove data, OpenStreetMap is a community, and the community (including Brazilians) must take responsibility for watching out for incompatibly licensed data being added, and for explaining the issue to new contributors.

When it comes to data use, OpenStreetMap is being less strict, and more free and open. We allow commercial use of our data, and derivative works. This creates exciting opportunities which otherwise do not exist. Most interesting applications of geodata, including rendering maps, requires making derivative works. In fact the open definition does not recognise NC restrictions as truly open. See also Why Sharealike Licenses Are Open But Non-Commercial Ones Aren't.

However volunteer contributors to Tracksource are making their contribution on the understanding that their data can not be used commercially. It may be that many or even most contributors do not care, but clearly the Tracksource community have collectively chosen* an NC license. This should be respected.

It's worth noting that data sources and the maps are the exclusive property of TrackSource, so the proprietors of this service chose the license, and they have the right to move to a better one. Then again their community has chosen to contribute under this license (perhaps without realising the restrictions in some cases!)

A volunteer mapping project

Tracksource has some similarities to OpenStreetMap. Started in 2002, it produces maps of Brazil through volunteer mapping, particularly gathering of GPS traces.

Their principle output is CC-BY-NC-ND licensed Garmin map downloads. The OpenStreetMap community also produces software and downloads for putting OSM Maps on Garmin, but OpenStreetMap is used in many many other ways by virtue of its more open license which permits derivative works and encourages experimentation with the data.

Tracksource operates a regional hierarchy by nominating volunteers as managers of the data at state and municipal level, perhaps similar to Google Map Maker. OpenStreetMap has no such hierarchy within the map editing community.