User talk:Ujos

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello Ujos, why did you remove 'router' from the GraphHopper wiki? Removing 'navi' is okayish but replacing just with 'library' makes it too broad IMO

Hi Karussell, I think `genre=navi` and `genre=router` are more designed for standalone applications. If you want to specify if this library supports navigation, just specify navToPoint tag. If you want to specify that library can calculate route, add calculateRoute tag.
--ujos (talk) 19:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
where can I find these tags and where can I see that it works ː) ?
--Karussell (talk) 21:22, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
See here: Template:Software. BTW, looks like tags `navigating=yes` and `routing=yes` are even better. Unfortunately the only way to check it is to use Osm_Software_Catalog application. Online version of this application is not up to date.
--ujos (talk) 21:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


Hello Ujos, why did you create the wiki page Open Route Service ?

There is already a wiki page about this web service, see OpenRouteService, so your fresh one is a duplicate. Removing? Greets, --Stephan75 (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not know that it exists. OpenRouteService does not have Template::Software. That is why I did not find it. I will move Template::Software from Open Route Service to OpenRouteService and after that you can remove my version.
--ujos (talk) 22:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
done! You can also ask on the OSM forum or via any other channel when you are not sure whether we already have a wiki page about a software or a web service ... I know them almost all in the wiki :-) --Stephan75 (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Would be good to find automatically all Software pages without Template::Software block.
--ujos (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Software Catalog

Hi Ujos, please could you add one or two sentences description to your new link at Software? Is it a executable program? On which OSs does it run? Please mention this. --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 18:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC) In the meantime I had a peek into the zip from sourceforge: seems to be .exe (Windows) and needs .NET 4.0. Also, I did not see any license info for the wiki content (you seem to have included the source code). I did not look into the .exe (I use no Windows). Please ensure that the license for the wiki content is respected. A last issue: are you aware of the issues with sourceforge – see wikipedia:SourceForge#Controversies? --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Firstly I edited the link from an extern on to a wiki link, as we already have a wiki page for Osm Software Catalog ... but IMHO that wiki page needs more content, what Aseerel4c26 is asking for. --Stephan75 (talk) 19:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Ah, thanks, Stephan75! --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Aseerel4c26, thank you for comments. And Stephan75 thanks for link update. I've added more description for this application to OSM Wiki. Added license to package. I'm not aware of issues related to Sourceforge but from time to time I check download links. I did not saw issues like described under the link wikipedia:SourceForge#Controversies. --Ujos 9:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the updates! :-) However, you have added OsmSoftwareCatalog/OpenStreetMap License.txt which contains the ODbL text, but if I understand correctly you do not use OSM (geographic) data. The wiki's text is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. See the footer of each wiki page. Images can have different licenses (I do not know if you use images). In addition to making the license text somehow accessible to the user's of your application they need to be made aware that the program's content is available under this license. You should at least mention it in the program's about window (if you have something). I hope I could clarify a bit. --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 19:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Fixed --Ujos 5:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you!, nearly fine! :-) In /MainForm.Designer.cs instead of "this.toolStripStatusLabel1.ToolTipText = "Content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.";" use "Content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License , content authors: see the history feature of the source pages.";. This is nearly complying with CC-by-sa. I say nearly because taken strictly this may not be enough to satisfy the conditions of the license (see section 4c - "give the Original Author credit"). I am not a lawyer.
And I found out why you used the ODbl, see my comment on Talk:OpenStreetMap_License. We need to fix this... --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 21:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Fixed. --Ujos (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)