Talk:Key:social facility:for

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Public travellers camps (residential=halting_site)

In some countries like France, they are 2 kinds of nomadic/travellers camp site (residential=halting_site): private and public. Public ones are built by cities or states with public funds to help those populations having places for living somewhere for few months.

Can we imagine a "social facility:for=nomadic" or "social facility:for=travellers" ?

I am hesitant to put these places under the social facility umbrella, but maybe your incarnations are different from the ones around here? When you speak about “nomadic”, is this an euphemism to describe rejection of these peoples by large parts of the society, or are these truly nomadic peoples that actually move around? —Dieterdreist (talk) 07:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
It's a real debat :-) It's about People living in carvan include tinkers, carnies, seasonal workers, gypsies ... in France it is compulsory by law for cities with more than 5000 inhabitants to build some places for travellers.

social_facility:for=all

Would it be OK to use social_facility:for=all in case of unrestricted use (except that, for example, there would be some social consequence and anyway rich would not use as they would be able to get better resources from elsewhere)?

For example social_facility=soup_kitchen may be available to anyone. I know about some which have ridiculously low symbolic prices and voluntary donations for meals Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 23:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Add non-drug related addictions

There also addictions with no relation to drugs. Like gambling and other stuff. So I would like to add an value "addicted" with contains those facilities with no relation to drugs but other addictions. --Josaur (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Well, the spectrum of what can be considered a "drug" is of course wide. Don't know if some people would call "slots" a "digital drug" for example. I can see your point definetely, I think it would be interesting then, how a more general "addicted" can then be used to express which addiction the facility is for.--Lukas458 (talk) 14:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)