User:MalgiK/Contact:website / website / url

Comparison of "contact:website / website / url" tagging and showing some pros and cons.

Taginfo

To illustrate how often each tag is used, here are the taginfo statistics for these different tags:

contact:website=*	website=*	url=*

contact:phone=*	phone=*

contact:email=*	email=*

contact:fax=*	fax=*

Notes & Advantages

All three tagings having equal rights.
There is an advantage of website=* and url=*: It's faster to use, because you don't have to type in so many letter, if you don't use any editor presets
There is an advantage of contact:website=*: For getting better/faster overview of tag arrangement which will be a kind of a group for namespace contact=*. This is similar which osm also used for addr=*. See following table for illustration.

email=* / fax=* / phone=* / website=* / (url=*)	contact=*
building=yes email=abc@defghi.com fax=+178859324765 internet_access=yes name=no order poi operator=Grange Hotels phone=+177637955 tourism=hotel website=http://www.no-order-hotel.com/ examples: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BLL (click "Run" button top left to show results)	building=yes contact:email=jkl@mnopqr.com contact:fax=+178859324765 contact:phone=+177637955 contact:website=http://www.all-c-togehter-hotel.com/ internet_access=yes name=nice contact order poi tourism=guest_house wheelchair=yes examples: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BLM (click "Run" button top left to show results)

So please decide by yourself which one you prefer.
Interpreter software should know all of them anyway.

See also

• Contact:website_/_website_/_url - latest version: comparison & overview of contact schemes/tags
• Gym_/_Fitness_centre - comparison & overview the distribution of gym and fitness tags
• Discussions/tagging/contact:phone_or_phone - 2019/11 rejected attempt to merge phone=* and contact:phone=* to only phone=*